Hello All,

There is no way possible regressions here could be related to my patch. The patch is modifying kms_vrr clean up. Setups reporting possible failure are either skipping kms_vrr completely or not running it at all.

BR,

Jouni Högander

On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 18:02 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
Patch Details
Series: tests/kms_vrr: Set VRR_ENABLED property as false for non-VRR panel as well
URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/141351/
State: failure
Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12105/index.html

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_15695_full -> IGTPW_12105_full

Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_12105_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_12105_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12105/index.html

Participating hosts (10 -> 9)

Missing (1): shard-glk

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_12105_full:

IGT changes

Possible regressions

Known issues

Here are the changes found in IGTPW_12105_full that come from known issues:

IGT changes

Issues hit

Possible fixes

Warnings

{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).