From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 7/8] tests/sriov_basic: validate driver binding to VFs
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 21:47:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79c11e97-7185-4aad-adc3-0dd36f8a1382@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231204171033.2167-8-lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
On 04.12.2023 18:10, Lukasz Laguna wrote:
> From: Katarzyna Dec <katarzyna.dec@intel.com>
>
> Test enables VFs in range <1..totalvfs>, bind driver to all of them and
> then unbind driver from all of them.
>
> v2:
> - remove checks that are outside the scope of the test (Michal)
> - change subtest run type (Michal)
>
> Cc: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Katarzyna Dec <katarzyna.dec@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/sriov_basic.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/sriov_basic.c b/tests/sriov_basic.c
> index 582e644f2..c2c8e5b6b 100644
> --- a/tests/sriov_basic.c
> +++ b/tests/sriov_basic.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,36 @@ static void enable_vfs_autoprobe_on(int pf_fd, unsigned int num_vfs)
> igt_assert(!err);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * SUBTEST: enable-vfs-bind-all-unbind-all
> + * Description:
> + * Verify VFs enabling, binding the driver and then unbinding it from all of them
> + * Run type: FULL
> + */
> +static void enable_vfs_bind_all_unbind_all(int pf_fd, unsigned int num_vfs)
> +{
> + igt_debug("Testing %u VFs\n", num_vfs);
> +
> + igt_require(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(pf_fd) == 0);
> +
> + igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd);
> + igt_sriov_enable_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs);
> + igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd);
> +
> + for (int i = 1; i <= num_vfs; i++) {
> + igt_assert(!igt_sriov_is_vf_drm_driver_probed(pf_fd, i));
> + igt_sriov_bind_vf_drm_driver(pf_fd, i);
> + igt_assert(igt_sriov_is_vf_drm_driver_probed(pf_fd, i));
> + }
what's the point in keeping all VFs drivers loaded ?
do we really want to stress the system ?
our goal should be to check that VF driver loads on each VF
IMO the enable_vfs_bind_unbind_each() from 8/8 provides sufficient
coverage, while this one will just consume machine-test-hours
also this test duplicates enable_vfs_autoprobe_on() from 5/8 (just loads
the all drivers manually instead of PCI-subsystem autoprobe)
> +
> + for (int i = 1; i <= num_vfs; i++) {
> + igt_sriov_unbind_vf_drm_driver(pf_fd, i);
> + igt_assert(!igt_sriov_is_vf_drm_driver_probed(pf_fd, i));
> + }
> +
> + igt_sriov_disable_vfs(pf_fd);
> +}
> +
> igt_main
> {
> int pf_fd;
> @@ -110,6 +140,25 @@ igt_main
> }
> }
>
> + igt_describe("Verify VFs enabling, binding the driver and then unbinding it from all of them");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("enable-vfs-bind-all-unbind-all") {
> + for_each_sriov_num_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs) {
> + igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-%u", num_vfs) {
> + enable_vfs_bind_all_unbind_all(pf_fd, num_vfs);
> + }
> + }
> + for_random_sriov_num_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs) {
> + igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-random") {
> + enable_vfs_bind_all_unbind_all(pf_fd, num_vfs);
> + }
> + }
> + for_max_sriov_num_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs) {
> + igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-all") {
> + enable_vfs_bind_all_unbind_all(pf_fd, num_vfs);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> igt_fixture {
> igt_sriov_disable_vfs(pf_fd);
> /* abort to avoid execution of next tests with enabled VFs */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-04 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 17:10 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 0/8] Initial SR-IOV validation Lukasz Laguna
2023-12-04 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 1/8] lib/igt_sriov_device: add core SR-IOV helpers Lukasz Laguna
2023-12-04 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 2/8] lib/igt_sriov_device: add helper for opening VF device Lukasz Laguna
2023-12-04 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 3/8] lib/igt_sriov_device: add helper for checking if VF DRM driver is probed Lukasz Laguna
2023-12-04 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 4/8] lib/igt_sriov_device: add helpers for operations in different VFs scenarios Lukasz Laguna
2023-12-04 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 5/8] tests/sriov_basic: add basic tests for enabling SR-IOV VFs Lukasz Laguna
2023-12-04 20:50 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-12-05 8:04 ` Laguna, Lukasz
2023-12-04 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 6/8] lib/igt_sriov_device: add helpers for VF DRM driver bind and unbind Lukasz Laguna
2023-12-04 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 7/8] tests/sriov_basic: validate driver binding to VFs Lukasz Laguna
2023-12-04 20:47 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2023-12-04 17:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6 8/8] tests/sriov_basic: add more tests for VF driver binding Lukasz Laguna
2023-12-04 18:15 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Initial SR-IOV validation (rev7) Patchwork
2023-12-04 19:00 ` [igt-dev] ✓ CI.xeBAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=79c11e97-7185-4aad-adc3-0dd36f8a1382@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox