From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <7b948154-8b32-bb0a-0268-46194b8129ae@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 08:35:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: "Dixit, Ashutosh" , Rodrigo Vivi References: <20230717165318.831766-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> <20230717171219.832728-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> <87sf9mib8k.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: Tvrtko Ursulin In-Reply-To: <87sf9mib8k.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/i915_pm_rps: Fix test after silent conflict List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Tvrtko Ursulin Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: On 17/07/2023 20:33, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:53:27 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 06:12:19PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin >>> >>> A silent conflict sneaked in as I was merging >>> d86ca7e17b58 ("tests/i915_pm_rps: Exercise sysfs thresholds") in a way >>> that igt_sysfs_set_u32 has became a function returning void. >>> >>> Assert is now built-in so drop it from the test. >>> >>> v2: >>> * Fix invalid value test. >>> * Assert new values after write while at it. >> >> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi > > Merged to fix the IGT build. Ah thank you, didn't realize it was broken, I thought it was only warnings. Regards, Tvrtko