On 5/8/2024 7:22 AM, Kamil Konieczny wrote: > Hi Jagmeet, > On 2024-05-07 at 12:23:12 -0700, Jagmeet Randhawa wrote: >> Fix typos to follow proper format. > While at it could you also rephrase it somewhat? > See below, no need for sending new version, just > reply in this thread. > > After agreement I could merge it with ack from Jonathan. > >> Cc: Jonathan Cavitt >> Signed-off-by: Jagmeet Randhawa >> --- >> lib/xe/xe_spin.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_spin.c b/lib/xe/xe_spin.c >> index 381e5e950..2dbd51199 100644 >> --- a/lib/xe/xe_spin.c >> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_spin.c >> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void xe_spin_init(struct xe_spin *spin, struct xe_spin_opts *opts) >> * xe_spin_started: >> * @spin: pointer to spinner mapped bo >> * >> - * Returns: true if spinner is running, othwerwise false. >> + * Returns: true if spinner is running, otherwise false. >> */ >> bool xe_spin_started(struct xe_spin *spin) >> { >> @@ -262,8 +262,8 @@ void xe_spin_sync_wait(int fd, struct igt_spin *spin) >> * xe_spin_free: >> * @spin: spin state from igt_spin_new() >> * >> - * Wrapper to free spinner whhich is triggered by xe_spin_create. >> - * which distroys vm, exec_queue and unbinds the vm which is binded to >> + * Wrapper to free spinner which is triggered by xe_spin_create. >> + * which destroys vm, exec_queue and unbinds the vm which is binded to > imho better would be: > > * Wrapper to free spinner created by xe_spin_create. It will > * destroy vm, exec_queue and unbind the vm which was binded to > > What you think? Jonathan? Btw 'triggered by' could stay, no strong > opinion for 'created by'. > > Regards, > Kamil Hey Kamil, I agree with you. Your description is more clean. I think 'created by' is a better fit.  If Jonathan is in agreement, we should also change the subject to "[PATCH i-g-t] lib/xe/xe_spin: Improve comments and fix typos" as you mentioned. >> * the exec_queue and bo. >> * >> */ >> -- >> 2.25.1 >>