public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naladala, Ramanaidu" <Ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>
To: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
	"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "B, Jeevan" <jeevan.b@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v2] lib/igt_psr: Fix Early Transport status handling
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:24:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80257ff3-e7de-4c04-bc97-bdd6b51147fd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <645964eee31a4df3c4fb1cf844f07e8bd9352424.camel@intel.com>


On 3/18/2026 1:48 PM, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-03-18 at 01:00 +0530, Naladala Ramanaidu wrote:
>> Switch PSR status reads to the connector‑specific debugfs path
>> to avoid ambiguity on dual eDP or multi‑output systems. This
>> ensures the Early Transport state is checked for the correct
>> connector.
>>
>> Update the Early Transport debugfs handling in line with changes
>> introduced in KMD (commit c390bf07961b, "drm/i915/dp: Fix panel
>> replay when DSC is enabled").
>>
>> v2: Addressed review comments. (jeevan)
>>
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251015161934.262108-8-imre.deak@intel.com/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naladala Ramanaidu <ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/igt_psr.c             | 8 +++++---
>>   lib/igt_psr.h             | 2 +-
>>   tests/intel/kms_psr2_sf.c | 2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.c b/lib/igt_psr.c
>> index 7e50c3dc6..09c34c97d 100644
>> --- a/lib/igt_psr.c
>> +++ b/lib/igt_psr.c
>> @@ -69,14 +69,16 @@ static bool psr_active_sink_check(int debugfs_fd,
>> igt_output_t *output)
>>   /*
>>    * Checks if Early Transport is enabled in PSR status by reading the
>> debugfs.
>>    */
>> -bool early_transport_check(int debugfs_fd)
>> +bool early_transport_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output)
>>   {
>>   	char buf[PSR_STATUS_MAX_LEN];
>> +	char debugfs_file[128] = {0};
>>   
>> -	igt_debugfs_simple_read(debugfs_fd, "i915_edp_psr_status",
>> buf,
>> +	SET_DEBUGFS_PATH(output, debugfs_file);
>> +	igt_debugfs_simple_read(debugfs_fd, debugfs_file, buf,
>>   		 		sizeof(buf));
>>   
>> -	return strstr(buf, "enabled (Early Transport)");
>> +	return strstr(buf, "Early Transport");
> Checked this and to me it looks like it may indicate improperly ET
> being enabled. This is what I'm seeing in debugfs entry:
>
> Sink support: PSR = yes [0x04] (Early Transport), Panel Replay = yes,
> Panel Replay Selective Update = yes (Early Transport)
> PSR mode: Panel Replay Selective Update enabled (Early Transport)
> Source PSR/PanelReplay ctl: enabled [0x40000000]
> PSR2_CTL: 0x08000000
> Source PSR/PanelReplay status: SLEEP [0x30200011]
> Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x00000000
> Performance counter: 0
> Frame:	PSR2 SU blocks:
> 0	33
> 1	256
> 2	512
> 3	0
> 4	0
> 5	0
> 6	0
> 7	0
> PSR2 selective fetch: enabled
>
> So I think panel stating ET support already returns true if using this
> check?
>
> BR,
> Jouni Högander
Hi Jouni,

In my system i have not seen Early Transport sting printed that many 
times. On What config you this debugfs.  As per the Link patch if Early 
transport is supported it will print (Early Transport) and if not 
supported it will not print the string.
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/DP-1/i915_psr_status
Sink support: PSR = no, Panel Replay = yes, Panel Replay Selective 
Update = yes, Panel Replay DSC support = selective update (Early Transport)
PSR mode: Panel Replay Selective Update enabled
Source PSR/PanelReplay ctl: enabled [0x40000000]
Source PSR/PanelReplay status: SU_STANDBY [0x64200010]
Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x00000000
Performance counter: 0
PSR2 selective fetch: enabled

Regards,
Ramanaidu N.
>
>>   }
>>   
>>   static bool sink_status_checks(void)
>> diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.h b/lib/igt_psr.h
>> index 7639f8d46..53ab04483 100644
>> --- a/lib/igt_psr.h
>> +++ b/lib/igt_psr.h
>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ enum fbc_mode {
>>   
>>   bool psr_disabled_check(int debugfs_fd);
>>   bool selective_fetch_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output);
>> -bool early_transport_check(int debugfs_fd);
>> +bool early_transport_check(int debugfs_fd, igt_output_t *output);
>>   bool psr_wait_entry(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode, igt_output_t
>> *output);
>>   bool psr_wait_update(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode,
>> igt_output_t *output);
>>   bool psr_long_wait_update(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode,
>> igt_output_t *output);
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_psr2_sf.c b/tests/intel/kms_psr2_sf.c
>> index 1cc57ad35..7503c7682 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/kms_psr2_sf.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_psr2_sf.c
>> @@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ static void run(data_t *data)
>>   			     "FBC still disabled\n");
>>   
>>   	if (is_et_check_needed(data))
>> -		igt_assert_f(early_transport_check(data-
>>> debugfs_fd),
>> +		igt_assert_f(early_transport_check(data->debugfs_fd,
>> data->output),
>>   			     "Early Transport Disabled\n");
>>   
>>   	data->screen_changes = 0;

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-26  9:42 [PATCH i-g-t v1] lib/igt_psr: Fix Early Transport status handling Naladala Ramanaidu
2026-02-26 16:19 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-02-26 16:39 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-26 17:13 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-02-27  2:58 ` [PATCH i-g-t v1] " B, Jeevan
2026-03-17 19:30 ` [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Naladala Ramanaidu
2026-03-18  4:17   ` B, Jeevan
2026-03-18  8:18   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-03-18  8:54     ` Naladala, Ramanaidu [this message]
2026-03-18  9:28       ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-03-18 10:38         ` Naladala, Ramanaidu
2026-03-18  2:02 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for lib/igt_psr: Fix Early Transport status handling (rev2) Patchwork
2026-03-18  2:12 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-19 14:57 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80257ff3-e7de-4c04-bc97-bdd6b51147fd@intel.com \
    --to=ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jeevan.b@intel.com \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox