From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7D5C61DD6 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2026 23:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AECA10E117; Tue, 1 Sep 2026 23:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Y5zcE8b/"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3B710E19E for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2026 23:20:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1788304822; x=1819840822; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=x3iBVfkxaQdFnMnJfudPblePso0vUvrMO0tiDQ2JUcY=; b=Y5zcE8b/nThzHMqYTzhrDAhhjB6A1Wy+tjwfvA4iXMI+34e2nY7EE7Vf NrvFoxkA2EsgTpUXkN4cgGoPM9wbZQ5KcXrx79JYYSeD9kDF+HTegc8Cn aGTH5rycIr5ISaZLEgh3Xebh13+wovbBhzJPhbjPOv/keJ/mXV7n389uE yxUSLmM14j7XXxwVdEw/u8UKrS6IH4DLKX+XlUGgTzjWty1d8rwUu5MD/ iRtyLR+qso9UD1woOqq7E4XVLcZE+ERWz0Eq1g/EyQWO09MMYvh2owNfI UAHvsMzU81HINgk1AM3sXXjM7H+mFwk4EZI52l6lDFNL2MZc+pfYhiCwJ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: irvzENQZTN++FGCgU0pd2w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Xh4z0qCmRn68LFMTTBDvmg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11893"; a="114295703" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,256,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="114295703" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2026 16:20:22 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fq/mbwjMTTCHMpOX5poeXw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: i8/4HXGZRjSukfd2YrApmg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,256,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="274508840" Received: from orsosgc001.jf.intel.com (HELO orsosgc001.intel.com) ([10.54.56.63]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2026 16:20:22 -0700 Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 16:20:21 -0700 Message-ID: <85se3smudm.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa Cc: Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?4pyX?= Xe.CI.FULL: failure for tests/intel/xe_oa: Add test to ensure entire report has landed (rev2) In-Reply-To: References: <20260826044209.1498337-2-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> <178772720290.85082.1686747611063721414@61270ab9df2a> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/30.2 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development mailing list for IGT GPU Tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" On Tue, 01 Sep 2026 16:06:15 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 06:53:22AM +0000, Patchwork wrote: > > Patch Details > > > > Series: tests/intel/xe_oa: Add test to ensure entire report has landed > > (rev2) URL: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/172599/ > > State: failure > > Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_15735/index.html > > CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_9074_FULL -> XEIGTPW_15735_FULL > > > > Summary > > > > FAILURE > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_15735_FULL absolutely need to > > be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in XEIGTPW_15735_FULL, please notify your bug team > > (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in > > CI. > > > > Participating hosts (2 -> 2) > > > > No changes in participating hosts > > > > Possible new issues > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > > XEIGTPW_15735_FULL: > > > > IGT changes > > > > Possible regressions > > > > * igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@256x256-right-edge@pipe-a-dp-2: > > > > * shard-bmg: PASS -> ABORT > > * {igt@xe_oa@non-zero-reports} (NEW): > > > > * shard-lnl: NOTRUN -> FAIL +1 other test fail > > > > New tests > > > > New tests have been introduced between XEIGT_9074_FULL and > > XEIGTPW_15735_FULL: > > > > New IGT tests (2) > > > > * igt@xe_oa@non-zero-reports: > > > > * Statuses : 1 fail(s) > > * Exec time: [0.49] s > > * igt@xe_oa@non-zero-reports@oag-0: > > > > * Statuses : 1 fail(s) > > * Exec time: [0.46] s > > Looks like the failure here in LNL is a different (new) issue. The oa > config does not seem to have applied correctly in this case, so the report > is using bad PES values. The test may have to wait on a fence for the > config to be applied fully. Hmm, if we don't specify syncs in the input properties, the kernel will itself wait on the fence for OA config to be applied. We aren't even sure if PES config needs the 500 microsecond NOA wait delay. Or, if PES config is not being applied correctly, we could try to increase that 500 us delay and check if that makes a difference. Thanks. -- Ashutosh