From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>,
pravalika.gurram@intel.com, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
nishit.sharma@intel.com, himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] intel-ci: Blocklist compression PAT index for LNL
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 09:39:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871po7k6uq.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250915120829.ghqdzoe3wz3kl5vp@kamilkon-DESK.igk.intel.com>
On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 05:08:29 -0700, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
>
> Hi pravalika.gurram,
> On 2025-09-15 at 16:20:57 +0530, pravalika.gurram@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Pravalika Gurram <pravalika.gurram@intel.com>
> >
> > Madvise does not support compression on LNL.
> > Therefore, compression-related PAT index
> > test cases have been blocklisted for this platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pravalika Gurram <pravalika.gurram@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
What is the guidance for when we blocklist a test vs. when we skip it,
using igt_skip or igt_require?
>
> > ---
> > tests/intel-ci/xe.lnl.core.blocklist.txt | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/xe.lnl.core.blocklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/xe.lnl.core.blocklist.txt
> > index 1e69170d8..3a21d7263 100644
> > --- a/tests/intel-ci/xe.lnl.core.blocklist.txt
> > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/xe.lnl.core.blocklist.txt
> > @@ -83,3 +83,9 @@ igt@xe_live_ktest@xe_eudebug
> > igt@xe_oa@oa-tlb-invalidate
> > igt@xe_oa@unprivileged-single-ctx-counters
> > ##################################################################
> > +# Expected fail as per the current behaviour compression
> > +# for madvise needs to skipped on LNL
> > +##################################################################
> > +igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@pat-index-madvise-pat-idx-wt-.*
> > +igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@pat-index-madvise-pat-idx-uc-comp-.*
> > +##################################################################
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 10:50 [PATCH v6 0/2] Add pat-index-madvise pravalika.gurram
2025-09-15 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator: " pravalika.gurram
2025-09-15 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] intel-ci: Blocklist compression PAT index for LNL pravalika.gurram
2025-09-15 12:08 ` Kamil Konieczny
2025-09-15 16:39 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2025-09-15 20:39 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-09-16 10:08 ` Kamil Konieczny
2025-09-15 21:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Add pat-index-madvise Patchwork
2025-09-15 21:45 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-16 1:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-16 2:47 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871po7k6uq.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=pravalika.gurram@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox