From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v2] lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 07:43:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cd8gqn7.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78c5f531-f482-49c7-8290-38710698e4a7@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:03:19 -0700, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
>
Hi Peter,
> Changes xe_query_oa_units_new() to return NULL instead of aborting
> due to assertion failure when querying for DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_OA_UNITS.
>
> It adds a skip to xe_oa.c to make sure it will not try to run the tests if the
> query has failed before.
>
> The motivation is as follows:
> - The only test that requires oa_units is tests/intel/xe_oa.c, however current
> code will prevent all Xe tests from running if OA_UNITS is not supported
> - Before this patch, trying to run IGT on the Xe module from Fedora 40
> (6.9.9-200.fc40.x86_64) fails
> - After this patch, we can run some tests, such as xe_exec_basic
> successfully
As far as I understand the purpose of IGT is to test the latest drm-tip
kernels. Also, I would think testing older kernels is of dubious value,
since bugs you would find there would typically have been fixed in later
kernels.
I also consider this patch sort of temporary, I would imagine it can be
reverted after distro kernels have moved to 6.11 where the uapi in this
patch will be available.
With that out of the way, I will approve this patch for merging but I have
a couple of nit-picks below.
>
> Here is an example of the impact of this patch:
> 1. Use Fedora 40 with the following kernel command line arguments:
> "xe.force_probe=* i915.force_probe=!* modprobe.blacklist=i915,ast,snd_hda_intel,xe"
>
> 2. Running IGT without this patch will fail:
> $ sudo ./build/tests/xe_exec_basic
> $ echo $?
> 98
>
> 3. Running after fix applied will succeed:
> sudo ./build/tests/xe_exec_basic
> $ sudo ./build/tests/xe_exec_basic
> $ echo $?
> 0
>
> V2:
> - Cleanup headers from message body
> - Add 'lib/xe/xe_query:' to subject line
Also, note that, assuming you are new here, for IGT and kernel, the commit
message should explain the "why" or the reason for the patch. So I would
think the above commit message can be condensed, but that is up to you,
it's ok with me.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/xe/xe_query.c | 6 +++++-
> tests/intel/xe_oa.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_query.c b/lib/xe/xe_query.c
> index 84eaaac96..f0643e1bc 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_query.c
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_query.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,11 @@ static struct drm_xe_query_oa_units *xe_query_oa_units_new(int fd)
> .data = 0,
> };
>
> - igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &query), 0);
> + /**
I am seeing, in IGT, the "/**" comment pattern used only for test or
subtest description. So we should just use this pattern for multi-line
comments:
/*
* This is a multi-line comment
*/
> + * Only tests/intel/xe_oa.c needs OA_UNITS
This comment is misleading and needs to be changed. Please change it to
something like (no need for multi-line comment either):
/* Support older kernels where this uapi is not yet available */
Since this is the real reason for this change.
> + */
> + if (igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &query) != 0)
No need for "!= 0", just do:
if (igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &query))
> + return NULL;
>
> oa_units = malloc(query.size);
> igt_assert(oa_units);
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> index ff2218300..dd02f8608 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> @@ -4503,6 +4503,7 @@ static const char *xe_engine_class_name(uint32_t engine_class)
> igt_main
> {
> struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe = NULL;
> + struct xe_device *xe_dev;
>
> igt_fixture {
> struct stat sb;
> @@ -4527,7 +4528,13 @@ igt_main
> igt_assert_eq(drm_fd, -1);
>
> drm_fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
> - xe_device_get(drm_fd);
> + xe_dev = xe_device_get(drm_fd);
> +
> + /**
> + * This test needs OA_UNITS to run, see xe_query_oa_units_new()
> + * on lib/xe/xe_query.c
Here just say:
/* See xe_query_oa_units_new() */
Kernel style is to minimize comments and also minimize unnecessary
verbosity in comments.
> + */
> + igt_require(xe_dev->oa_units);
>
> devid = intel_get_drm_devid(drm_fd);
> sysfs = igt_sysfs_open(drm_fd);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Please fix these things up and resend. Then I will will R-b and merge the
patch.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-26 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-25 14:03 [PATCH i-g-t v2] lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests Peter Senna Tschudin
2024-07-25 17:30 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-07-25 17:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-07-25 21:25 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-26 5:07 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests (rev2) Patchwork
2024-07-26 5:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-26 6:26 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests (rev3) Patchwork
2024-07-26 6:36 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-07-26 10:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests Patchwork
2024-07-26 14:43 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2024-07-26 15:01 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure for lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests (rev2) Patchwork
2024-07-26 16:27 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure for lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests (rev3) Patchwork
2024-07-27 0:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-07-29 5:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3] Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests Peter Senna Tschudin
2024-07-29 7:00 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-07-29 17:41 ` Kamil Konieczny
2024-07-29 5:55 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests (rev4) Patchwork
2024-07-29 6:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-07-29 7:33 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-29 11:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-07-31 11:17 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4] lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests Peter Senna Tschudin
2024-07-31 15:24 ` Kamil Konieczny
2024-08-06 19:48 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-07-31 13:58 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests (rev5) Patchwork
2024-07-31 14:11 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-31 15:13 ` Kamil Konieczny
2024-07-31 15:52 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
2024-08-02 9:40 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for lib/xe/xe_query: Do not require QUERY_OA_UNITS for all Xe tests (rev6) Patchwork
2024-08-02 9:43 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-08-02 10:32 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-08 6:54 ` Peter Senna Tschudin
2024-08-02 20:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877cd8gqn7.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peter.senna@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox