From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:36:50 -0800 Message-ID: <877cx2v9dp.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" To: Janusz Krzysztofik In-Reply-To: <1949047.usQuhbGJ8B@jkrzyszt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20230131091731.5892-1-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> <87a61yvfq3.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> <1949047.usQuhbGJ8B@jkrzyszt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/i915/perf: Add stress / race exercises List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Chris Wilson Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:36:30 -0800, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > Since Chris' subtest didn't help in triggering the list corruption, I've > developed a new subtest that can do it. Since it is almost identical to the > one Chris added, I decided to reuse his code, then add my new subtest to perf > as well. But maybe you are right that my subtest better fits to another test. > not perf. I'll think this over. > > I hope this clarifies things for you. Thanks Janusz. Of course the test is valid but because it is not triggering bugs in perf perhaps it is better added to a different IGT file. Maybe gem_ctx_persistence? Maybe perf is also ok. Anyway something to think about. Thanks. -- Ashutosh