From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tests/intel/xe_eu_stall: Add invalid input tests for EU stall sampling
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:35:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a596idfr.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b11a8dcb7191270ac55a6ac4ddab89ed03a31f90.1743067979.git.harish.chegondi@intel.com>
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 02:35:10 -0700, Harish Chegondi wrote:
>
> Add tests to verify that invalid inputs fail the tests
>
> Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_eu_stall.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_eu_stall.c b/tests/intel/xe_eu_stall.c
> index 964bb7c91..8f892a9ae 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_eu_stall.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_eu_stall.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,15 @@
> *
> * SUBTEST: unprivileged-access
> * Description: Verify unprivileged open of a EU stall data stream fd
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: invalid-gt-id
> + * Description: Verify that invalid input GT ID fails the test
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: invalid-sampling-rate
> + * Description: Verify that invalid input sampling rate fails the test
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: invalid-event-report-count
> + * Description: Verify that invalid input event report count fails the test
> */
>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> @@ -33,6 +42,9 @@
>
> #define OBSERVATION_PARANOID "/proc/sys/dev/xe/observation_paranoid"
>
> +#define NUM_DATA_ROWS(SIZE) ((SIZE) >> 6)
What is SIZE?
> +
> +#define MAX_SUBSLICES 64
What is a SUBSLICE? Is it a XeCore?
> #define NUM_ITERS_GPGPU_FILL 100
> #define DEFAULT_NUM_REPORTS 1
> #define DEFAULT_SAMPLE_RATE (251 * 4)
> @@ -283,6 +295,46 @@ static void set_fd_flags(int fd, int flags)
> igt_assert_eq(0, fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, old | flags));
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Verify that tests with invalid arguments fail.
> + */
> +static void test_invalid_arguments(int drm_fd, uint8_t gt_id, uint32_t rate, uint32_t num_reports)
> +{
> + uint64_t properties[] = {
> + DRM_XE_EU_STALL_PROP_GT_ID, gt_id,
> + DRM_XE_EU_STALL_PROP_SAMPLE_RATE, rate,
> + DRM_XE_EU_STALL_PROP_WAIT_NUM_REPORTS, num_reports,
> + };
> +
> + struct xe_eu_stall_open_prop props = {
> + .num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(properties) / 2,
> + .properties_ptr = to_user_pointer(properties),
> + };
> +
> + xe_eu_stall_ioctl_err(drm_fd, DRM_XE_OBSERVATION_OP_STREAM_OPEN, &props, EINVAL);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_invalid_gt_id(int fd)
> +{
> + test_invalid_arguments(fd, 255,
> + DEFAULT_SAMPLE_RATE,
> + DEFAULT_NUM_REPORTS);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_invalid_sampling_rate(int fd)
> +{
> + test_invalid_arguments(fd, p_gt_id,
Instead of using p_gt_id, maybe just use 0 here. Sometime p_* are used,
sometimes DEFAUL_* are used, it's annoying.
For example, at the top of the file where the global's are defined, why is
p_rate not assigned to DEFAULT_SAMPLE_RATE?
> + (251 * 10),
> + DEFAULT_NUM_REPORTS);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_invalid_event_report_count(int fd)
> +{
> + test_invalid_arguments(fd, p_gt_id,
> + DEFAULT_SAMPLE_RATE,
> + (NUM_DATA_ROWS(512 * 1024) * MAX_SUBSLICES) + 1);
Also the indentation is off. Things should be aligned to the opening '('.
> +}
> +
> static inline void enable_paranoid(void)
> {
> write_u64_file(OBSERVATION_PARANOID, 1);
> @@ -615,6 +667,18 @@ igt_main_args("e:g:o:r:u:w:", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
> igt_subtest("unprivileged-access")
> test_non_privileged_access(drm_fd);
>
> + igt_describe("Verify that invalid input GT ID fails the test");
> + igt_subtest("invalid-gt-id")
> + test_invalid_gt_id(drm_fd);
> +
> + igt_describe("Verify that invalid input sampling rate fails the test");
> + igt_subtest("invalid-sampling-rate")
> + test_invalid_sampling_rate(drm_fd);
> +
> + igt_describe("Verify that invalid input event report count fails the test");
> + igt_subtest("invalid-event-report-count")
> + test_invalid_event_report_count(drm_fd);
> +
> igt_fixture {
> if (output)
> fclose(output);
> --
> 2.48.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-27 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 9:35 [PATCH 1/1] tests/intel/xe_eu_stall: Add invalid input tests for EU stall sampling Harish Chegondi
2025-03-27 14:19 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/1] " Patchwork
2025-03-27 14:34 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-27 17:35 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2025-03-27 17:42 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-03-28 0:44 ` Harish Chegondi
2025-03-27 22:00 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for series starting with [1/1] " Patchwork
2025-04-06 14:11 ` Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a596idfr.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=harish.chegondi@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox