From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Make the result an incomplete if a test is killed due to taint
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:13:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blqm9wq7.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158030646210.11197.985551830684189117@skylake-alporthouse-com>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Quoting Petri Latvala (2020-01-29 13:56:19)
>> If we're checking for taints, we kill the test as soon as we notice a
>> taint. Out of the box, such killing will get marked as such and yields
>> a 'timeout' result, which is misleading. The test didn't spend too
>> much time, it just did nasties.
>>
>> Make sure taint-killing results in an 'incomplete' result
>> instead. It's still not completely truthful for the state of the
>> testing but closer than a 'timeout'. And stands out more in CI result
>> analysis.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>
> Incomplete has been synonymous in my mind with the "kernel oopsed" so it
> worksforme. Even if the HW dies, everyone blames the kernel for letting
> it die!
>
So with this patch, we can now assume 'incomplete' is always
atleast oops/bug_on or a more catastrophics system hang?
-Mika
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-29 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-29 13:56 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Make the result an incomplete if a test is killed due to taint Petri Latvala
2020-01-29 14:01 ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-29 14:13 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2020-01-29 14:27 ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-29 16:37 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-01-30 8:57 ` Petri Latvala
2020-02-01 2:05 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87blqm9wq7.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox