From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>,
Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib/intel_wa: Assert on error instead of returning -1
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 16:53:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cxysgtr3.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ecjbgofi.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:11:13 -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 May 2026 05:24:08 -0700, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> >
>
> Hi Kamil,
>
> > Hi Shekhar,
> > On 2026-05-14 at 12:06:55 +0530, Shekhar Chauhan wrote:
> > > igt_has_intel_wa() returns 0, 1, or -1, but there is no point
> > > distinguishing the error and no-workaround cases for callers. Replace
> > > the error return with igt_assert() and simplify debugfs_file_has_wa() by
> > > dropping the igt_debugfs_exists() check, since igt_sysfs_get() returns
> > > NULL for missing files anyway.
> > >
> > > v2: Make the func as bool instead of int.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > lib/intel_wa.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> > > lib/intel_wa.h | 2 +-
> > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/intel_wa.c b/lib/intel_wa.c
> > > index 727dd6c98..e4fe7b0ee 100644
> > > --- a/lib/intel_wa.c
> > > +++ b/lib/intel_wa.c
> > > @@ -7,18 +7,18 @@
> > > #include <stdint.h>
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > >
> > > +#include "igt_core.h"
> > > #include "igt_debugfs.h"
> > > #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> > > #include "intel_wa.h"
> > > #include "xe/xe_query.h"
> > >
> > > -static int debugfs_file_has_wa(int drm_fd, int debugfs_fd,
> > > +static bool debugfs_file_has_wa(int drm_fd, int debugfs_fd,
> > > const char *debugfs_name, const char *wa)
> > > {
> > > char *debugfs_dump;
> > >
> > > - if (!igt_debugfs_exists(drm_fd, debugfs_name, O_RDONLY))
> > > - return -1;
> > > + igt_assert(igt_debugfs_exists(drm_fd, debugfs_name, O_RDONLY));
> > >
> > > debugfs_dump = igt_sysfs_get(debugfs_fd, debugfs_name);
> > > if (debugfs_dump) {
> > > @@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ static int debugfs_file_has_wa(int drm_fd, int debugfs_fd,
> > > free(debugfs_dump);
> > >
> > > if (has_wa)
> > > - return 1;
> > > + return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - return 0;
> > > + return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -38,18 +38,17 @@ static int debugfs_file_has_wa(int drm_fd, int debugfs_fd,
> > > * @drm_fd: A drm file descriptor
> > > * @check_wa: Workaround to be checked
> > > *
> > > - * Returns: 0 if no WA, 1 if WA present, -1 on error
> > > + * Returns: true if WA present, false otherwise
> > > */
> > > -int igt_has_intel_wa(int drm_fd, const char *check_wa)
> > > +bool igt_has_intel_wa(int drm_fd, const char *check_wa)
> > > {
> > > - int ret = 0;
> > > + bool ret = 0;
> > > int debugfs_fd;
> > > unsigned int xe;
> > > char name[256];
> > >
> > > debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(drm_fd);
> > > - if (debugfs_fd == -1)
> > > - return -1;
> > > + igt_assert(debugfs_fd >= 0);
> >
> > This will mean that all other users needs to be updated.
>
> To date there are no other users of this function, except one in OA.
>
> > The way of adding any igt_assert/igt_require into lib/
> > make it impossible to reuse them in tools/ and require
> > to write same functionality twice, one in lib/ and one
> > for any tools which will want to use them. Or to write
> > __function() without igt_assert/igt_require.
>
> Well it was I who suggested doing this. Can you explain your point a bit?
> Any tools which use a lib function which uses e.g. igt_assert/igt_require
> can also link with lib_igt (which provides igt_assert/igt_require). See
> e.g. tools/xe-perf/meson.build. It is not unreasonable for IGT tools to
> link with lib_igt. I thought not linking with igt_lib was an unreasonabe
> requirement and I removed it for tools/xe-perf.
>
> If you are saying tools should be able to run without debugfs mounted,
> maybe you have a point. In that case we can drop this patch. But even here
> maybe IGT tools should run only with debugfs mounted?
Also the tool should realize it is calling a function which requires
debugfs, and separately check whether or not debugfs is mounted and skip
calling the function if it isn't. So I am not sure why we should do
anything different, since wa list is exposed through debugfs.
>
>
> > > xe_for_each_gt(drm_fd, xe) {
> > > sprintf(name, "gt%d/workarounds", xe);
> > > diff --git a/lib/intel_wa.h b/lib/intel_wa.h
> > > index 765a5948e..34cafecc4 100644
> > > --- a/lib/intel_wa.h
> > > +++ b/lib/intel_wa.h
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,6 @@
> > > #ifndef __INTEL_WA_H__
> > > #define __INTEL_WA_H__
> > >
> > > -int igt_has_intel_wa(int drm_fd, const char *check_wa);
> > > +bool igt_has_intel_wa(int drm_fd, const char *check_wa);
> > >
> > > #endif /* __INTEL_WA_H__ */
> > > --
> > > 2.53.0
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 6:36 [PATCH v2] lib/intel_wa: Assert on error instead of returning -1 Shekhar Chauhan
2026-05-14 6:48 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2026-05-14 7:23 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2026-05-14 7:37 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-05-15 4:11 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-05-15 12:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Kamil Konieczny
2026-05-16 19:11 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2026-05-18 23:53 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2026-05-19 9:52 ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-05-20 22:18 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2026-05-19 9:54 ` Kamil Konieczny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cxysgtr3.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shekhar.chauhan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox