From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F10310E042
 for <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 18:28:31 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:28:29 -0700
Message-ID: <87cz0phy5u.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <87edl5hybs.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
References: <20230718111736.3324211-1-badal.nilawar@intel.com>
 <87edl5hybs.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3] tests/xe: Verify actual frequency on
 the basis of GT state
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/igt-dev>,
 <mailto:igt-dev-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igt-dev-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev>,
 <mailto:igt-dev-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "igt-dev" <igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-ID: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>

On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:24:55 -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
>
> Sorry I missed this yesterday. Basically why do we have the
> igt_wait(xe_is_gt_in_c6()) above at the top when we are waking up the gt
> when reading cur freq later?
>
> Maybe instead of this usleep, we can this do here:
>
>		igt_assert(igt_wait(xe_is_gt_in_c6(fd, gt_id), 1000, 1));

Actually, maybe:

		igt_assert(igt_wait(xe_is_gt_in_c6(fd, gt_id), 1000, 10));

>
> And get rid of the igt_require(igt_wait()) at the top?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh