Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915: Avoid set_domain -ENOMEM error with huge buffers
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:31:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eefwo2u6.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM0jSHPXQZFJwa0DQOgyvK-Qjq9_meEzCL11joYqkve+MTS9cA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:28:01 -0700, Matthew Auld wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 04:51, Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > When pread/pwrite are unavailable, the pread/pwrite replacement implemented
> > in ad5eb02eb3f1 ("lib/ioctl_wrappers: Keep IGT working without pread/pwrite
> > ioctls") uses gem_set_domain which pins all pages which have to be
> > read/written. When the read/write size is large this causes gem_set_domain
> > to return -ENOMEM with a trace such as:
> >
> > ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function gem_set_domain, file ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:563:
> > ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_set_domain(fd, handle, read, write) == 0
> > ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Last errno: 12, Cannot allocate memory
> > ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -12 != 0
> > igt_core-INFO: Stack trace:
> > igt_core-INFO:   #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1746 __igt_fail_assert()
> > igt_core-INFO:   #1 [gem_set_domain+0x44]
> > igt_core-INFO:   #2 ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:367 gem_write()
> > igt_core-INFO:   #3 ../tests/prime_mmap.c:67 test_aperture_limit()
> > igt_core-INFO:   #4 ../tests/prime_mmap.c:578 __real_main530()
> > igt_core-INFO:   #5 ../tests/prime_mmap.c:530 main()
> >
> > Therefore avoid using the pread/pwrite replacement for huge buffers, mmap
> > and write instead. This fixes failures seen in
> > prime_mmap@test_aperture_limit and gem_exec_params@larger-than-life-batch
> > when pread/pwrite are unavailable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c |  5 ++++-
> >  tests/prime_mmap.c           | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c
> > index 6840cf40ce..613bc26485 100644
> > --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c
> > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c
> > @@ -254,9 +254,12 @@ static uint32_t batch_create_size(int fd, uint64_t size)
> >  {
> >         const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> >         uint32_t handle;
> > +       char *ptr;
> >
> >         handle = gem_create(fd, size);
> > -       gem_write(fd, handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe));
> > +       ptr = gem_mmap__device_coherent(fd, handle, 0, sizeof(bbe), PROT_WRITE);
> > +       memcpy(ptr, &bbe, sizeof(bbe));
> > +       munmap(ptr, sizeof(bbe));
>
> I thought mmap_offfset still just pins all the pages on fault, so why
> don't we still hit -ENOMEM somewhere?

Sorry I think this statement in the commit message is what has caused the
confusion, it's just badly written: "gem_set_domain which pins all pages
which have to be read/written". set_domain doesn't just pin all pages which
have to read/written but actually pins the entire object. Does this explain
the reason now?

I would assume mmap_offset would only fault in the required pages.

> I would have assumed we want gem_mmap__cpu/wc here,

My intention is to gem_mmap__device_coherent as a shorthand for
gem_mmap__wc (or gem_mmap_offset__wc).

> which instead goes through the shmem/page-cache backend, and so only
> needs to allocate the first few pages or so IIRC, similar to the tricks
> in the shmem pwrite backend? Or I guess just move the igt_require() for
> the memory requirements to earlier?

Even if we did that I think we might still need to fix the issue with the
set_domain pinning the entire object so that's what I'm trying to avoid
here with this patch. Thanks.

> Or maybe I am misunderstanding something?
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-30 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-30  3:50 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915: Avoid set_domain -ENOMEM error with huge buffers Ashutosh Dixit
2021-03-30  4:26 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-03-30  5:27 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-30  5:44   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-03-30 18:06     ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-03-30 10:28 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Matthew Auld
2021-03-30 19:31   ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2021-03-31  9:02     ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-01  0:45       ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-04-01 12:49         ` Ruhl, Michael J
2021-04-01 19:25           ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-04-01 21:11             ` Ruhl, Michael J
2021-04-07  7:51   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-30 15:07 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-03-30 16:14 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-03-30 22:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915: Avoid set_domain -ENOMEM error with large objects Ashutosh Dixit
2021-03-31  7:52 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for i915: Avoid set_domain -ENOMEM error with huge buffers (rev2) Patchwork
2021-03-31  8:52 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-04-01  0:43 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915: Avoid set_domain -ENOMEM error with large objects Ashutosh Dixit
2021-04-01 10:22 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for i915: Avoid set_domain -ENOMEM error with huge buffers (rev3) Patchwork
2021-04-01 12:36 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87eefwo2u6.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.william.auld@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox