From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: "Zbigniew Kempczyński" <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/i915/gem_mman.c: add cpu coherency mapping wrapper
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 21:59:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eew2zig5.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114052728.13313-1-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 21:27:28 -0800, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
>
> For reduce code redundancy adding a wrapper for cpu memory mapping.
>
> +void *__gem_mmap__cpu_coherent(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset,
> + uint64_t size, unsigned prot)
> +{
> + void *ptr = __gem_mmap_offset__cpu(fd, handle, offset, size, prot);
> +
> + if (!ptr)
> + ptr = __gem_mmap__cpu(fd, handle, offset, size, prot);
> +
> + return ptr;
> +}
We need similar wrappers for WC and GTT too. So why don't we put this code
in __gem_mmap__cpu() itself and we can do the same for __gem_mmap__wc() and
__gem_mmap__gtt() too? Otherwise what are we going to call those functions?
Something like:
void *__gem_mmap__cpu(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset, uint64_t size, unsigned prot)
{
if (gem_has_mmap_offset(fd))
return __gem_mmap_offset(fd, handle, offset, size, prot, I915_MMAP_OFFSET_WB);
else
return __gem_mmap(fd, handle, offset, size, prot, 0);
}
So I am not sure of the point of introducing new wrappers, this code could
just be put in the old existing wrappers.
> +
> +/**
> + * gem_mmap__cpu_coherent:
> + * @fd: open i915 drm file descriptor
> + * @handle: gem buffer object handle
> + * @offset: offset in the gem buffer of the mmap arena
> + * @size: size of the mmap arena
> + * @prot: memory protection bits as used by mmap()
> + *
> + * Call __gem_mmap__cpu__coherent(), asserts on fail.
> + * Offset argument passed in function call must be 0. In the future
> + * when driver will allow slice mapping of buffer object this restriction
> + * will be removed.
> + *
> + * Returns: A pointer to the created memory mapping.
> + */
> +void *gem_mmap__cpu_coherent(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset,
This can just be gem_mmap__cpu()?
> + uint64_t size, unsigned prot)
> +{
> + void *ptr;
> +
> + igt_assert(offset == 0);
Not needed?
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-14 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-14 5:27 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/i915/gem_mman.c: add cpu coherency mapping wrapper Zbigniew Kempczyński
2020-01-14 5:59 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2020-01-14 11:14 ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-16 21:47 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2020-01-14 6:12 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-01-16 9:18 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eew2zig5.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox