From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76BB1C27C53 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9EA10EB9D; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="k5iZnCTt"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 410AF10EB9D for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:03:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1718791397; x=1750327397; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=9yIsXExdaREbBmUL3Q/MxP7LTOg6sFklyYbGmBbb1yk=; b=k5iZnCTth0myLKSVF8MVuBttreYjv54YF0BsTx2FG5nQCq1mJNq7vRn2 C3DN3tIZvibQvjgxXlQ6AhjDE5+Qd3pE+VVU5aNJsVin4YS3v5xkXLQeu /e/5gZb3WMzFP0skvUVkw9g9YTyTInv+E01B9ysc1uS1MdZkUMUYKMwym NebtSmJA1nNeoQyHQQwsiFVwpRF0MLTV6pMSGawfBQgCf/8su7xYeHaF8 IM7njiqP7G33rPX3ETJFnyQxQeB3+g7YoXZ9iaXPwYJTdIROaVvfBXBWJ qv8r/JQuhLRQ2ItEWeQLoOQg2RK5IDx+XXChOqMI64tF6iciL1gwIowim A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: sUzGtDJbSPqO9Q9CBuvyWw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8tLxS0vRSdiFpg1JtW8o/A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11107"; a="19500594" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,250,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="19500594" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jun 2024 03:03:15 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0xuON37KRIeTKC+zstEjig== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /rCnMkLuS9WuFAoarhsOXg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,250,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="46239253" Received: from fdefranc-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.249]) by fmviesa003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jun 2024 03:03:14 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Bhanuprakash Modem , igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Bhanuprakash Modem Subject: Re: [i-g-t] tests/intel-ci: Block unsupported KMS tests for i915 In-Reply-To: <20240619092049.4131162-1-bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20240619092049.4131162-1-bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:03:10 +0300 Message-ID: <87frt9fdwh.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development mailing list for IGT GPU Tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" On Wed, 19 Jun 2024, Bhanuprakash Modem wrote: > Block KMS tests those are specific to (display_ver > 14) > are not applicable for i915. Feels a bit wrong to list features like this in a block list. IMO the tests themselves should be aware of what's supported and what's not. I imagine the rationale is performance? What's the impact? BR, Jani. > > Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem > --- > tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt > index f6e9bb474..d01ef5e16 100644 > --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt > @@ -140,3 +140,6 @@ igt@device_reset@reset-bound > > # not working for i915 > igt@kms_bw@.* > + > +# Tests specific to (Display_ver > 14) are not applicable for i915 > +igt@kms_vrr@cmrr -- Jani Nikula, Intel