From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367D910E635 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 09:01:36 -0800 Message-ID: <87h787xdov.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" To: Anshuman Gupta In-Reply-To: <20220308144914.29185-3-anshuman.gupta@intel.com> References: <20220308144914.29185-1-anshuman.gupta@intel.com> <20220308144914.29185-3-anshuman.gupta@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/2] i915_pm_rpm: Add placement to gem_exec_stress List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, chris.p.wilson@intel.com Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 06:49:14 -0800, Anshuman Gupta wrote: > > This add memory region placement to gem_exec_stress group of test. > gem-execbuf-stress-pc8 is odd one test as PC8 is applicable to igfx > platform. dgfx soc has its own PkgG sates therefore memory region > placement is irrelevant for gem-execbuf-stress-pc8 test. > > v2: > - Deleted gem_memory_topology.[ch] and moved it's content > to intel_memory_region.[ch]. [Ashutosh] Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit