From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F3F16E82F
 for <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 2021 23:33:25 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 16:33:23 -0700
Message-ID: <87ilzilfi4.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210902153800.14831-1-arjun.melkaveri@intel.com>
References: <20210902153800.14831-1-arjun.melkaveri@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence:
 modified test_saturated_hostile subtest
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/igt-dev>,
 <mailto:igt-dev-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igt-dev-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev>,
 <mailto:igt-dev-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "igt-dev" <igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Arjun Melkaveri <arjun.melkaveri@intel.com>
Cc: zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
List-ID: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>

On Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:38:00 -0700, Arjun Melkaveri wrote:
>
> Applying saturated_hostile to support for twiddling the
> scheduling parameters via sysfs to tune timeouts.

Can you explain the motivation for this? Why this was not done previously
and why we want to do this now?