From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_mmap_gtt: Replace forked-mmaped tests with a lighter variant
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:37:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imprqc0v.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87muf3qcbh.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com>
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> writes:
> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>
>> Introduce a new 2-process fork test that is bound to a single cpu to
>> exercise contention during pagefaults. This is a much lighter variant of
>> the all-cpus test intended to be viable even on the legendary frozen
>> lakes of molasses.
>>
>> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110882
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c b/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c
>> index ac439cdf8..0428a1372 100644
>> --- a/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c
>> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt.c
>> @@ -792,9 +792,6 @@ test_huge_copy(int fd, int huge, int tiling_a, int tiling_b, int ncpus)
>> uint64_t huge_object_size, i;
>> unsigned mode = CHECK_RAM;
>>
>> - igt_fail_on_f(intel_gen(devid) >= 11 && ncpus > 1,
>> - "Please adjust your expectations, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110882\n");
>> -
>> switch (huge) {
>> case -2:
>> huge_object_size = gem_mappable_aperture_size() / 4;
>> @@ -1138,17 +1135,34 @@ igt_main
>> for (const struct copy_mode *m = copy_modes; m->suffix; m++) {
>> igt_subtest_f("%s-copy%s", s->prefix, m->suffix)
>> test_huge_copy(fd,
>> - s->size,
>> - m->tiling_x,
>> - m->tiling_y,
>> - 1);
>> + s->size,
>> + m->tiling_x,
>> + m->tiling_y,
>> + 1);
>> +
>> + igt_subtest_f("cpuset-%s-copy%s", s->prefix, m->suffix) {
>> + cpu_set_t cpu, old;
>> +
>> + sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(old), &old);
>> +
>> + CPU_ZERO(&cpu);
>> + CPU_SET(0, &cpu);
>> + igt_assert(sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu), &cpu) == 0);
>> + test_huge_copy(fd,
>> + s->size,
>> + m->tiling_x,
>> + m->tiling_y,
>> + 2);
>> +
>> + igt_assert(sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(old), &old) == 0);
>> + }
>>
>> igt_subtest_f("forked-%s-copy%s", s->prefix, m->suffix)
>> test_huge_copy(fd,
>> - s->size,
>> - m->tiling_x,
>> - m->tiling_y,
>> - ncpus);
>> + s->size,
>> + m->tiling_x,
>> + m->tiling_y,
>> + ncpus);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
>> index 8e3dafa98..5fa91105f 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
>> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ igt@gem_gtt_hog(@.*)?
>> igt@gem_gtt_speed(@.*)?
>> igt@gem_hangcheck_forcewake(@.*)?
>> igt@gem_lut_handle(@.*)?
>> -igt@gem_mmap_gtt@.*(huge|swap|clflush).*
>> +igt@gem_mmap_gtt@.*(huge|swap|clflush|forked).*
>
> Dunno if this is enough for bat to pick it up. Regardless,
> patch does what it says, using 2 threads on single cpu.
>
> It should fly, even with maps of molasses.
Subtest cpuset-basic-small-copy: SUCCESS (2,965s)
Subtest cpuset-basic-small-copy-XY: SUCCESS (4,457s)
Subtest cpuset-big-copy-XY: SUCCESS (17,738s)
Subtest cpuset-medium-copy-XY: SUCCESS (8,871s)
-Mika
>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>
>> igt@gem_mmap@.*(swap|huge).*
>> igt@gem_mocs_settings@.*(suspend|hibernate).*
>> igt@gem_pin(@.*)?
>> --
>> 2.23.0
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-17 13:09 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_mmap_gtt: Replace forked-mmaped tests with a lighter variant Chris Wilson
2019-09-17 13:31 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-09-17 13:37 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2019-09-17 14:49 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for " Patchwork
2019-09-17 15:11 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-09-18 1:20 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87imprqc0v.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox