Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Dominik Karol Piątkowski" <dominik.karol.piatkowski@intel.com>,
	igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Dominik Grzegorzek" <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>,
	"Christoph Manszewski" <christoph.manszewski@intel.com>,
	"Jan Sokolowski" <jan.sokolowski@intel.com>,
	"Dominik Karol Piątkowski" <dominik.karol.piatkowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 i-g-t 3/3] tests/xe_eudebug_online: Add set-breakpoint-sigint-debugger test
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:10:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msdql7ig.fsf@mkuoppal-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250311135529.5425-4-dominik.karol.piatkowski@intel.com>

Dominik Karol Piątkowski <dominik.karol.piatkowski@intel.com> writes:

> Add a test that sends SIGINT to the debugger thread with random timing
> and checks if nothing breaks, exercising the scenario multiple times.
>
> v2: Count correctly timed SIGINTs and assert that they happened (Mika)
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Karol Piątkowski <dominik.karol.piatkowski@intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 96 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c b/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c
> index 472013fe1..0ec1f2156 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c
> @@ -1506,6 +1506,98 @@ static void test_set_breakpoint_online(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instan
>  	online_debug_data_destroy(data);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * SUBTEST: set-breakpoint-sigint-debugger
> + * Description:
> + *	A variant of set-breakpoint that sends SIGINT to the debugger thread with random timing
> + *	and checks if nothing breaks, exercising the scenario multiple times.
> + */
> +static void test_set_breakpoint_online_sigint_debugger(int fd,
> +						       struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe,
> +						       int flags)
> +{
> +	struct xe_eudebug_session *s;
> +	struct online_debug_data *data;
> +	struct timespec ts = { };
> +	int loop_count = 0;
> +	uint64_t sleep_time;
> +	uint64_t set_breakpoint_time;
> +	uint64_t max_sleep_time;
> +	uint64_t events_max = 0;
> +	int sigints_during_test = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Measure the average time required for basic set-breakpoint variant,
> +	 * so sleep_time range is correct.
> +	 */
> +	igt_nsec_elapsed(&ts);
> +	for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> +		test_set_breakpoint_online(fd, hwe, SHADER_NOP | TRIGGER_UFENCE_SET_BREAKPOINT);
> +	set_breakpoint_time = igt_nsec_elapsed(&ts) / (NSEC_PER_MSEC / USEC_PER_MSEC) / 10;
> +	igt_info("Average set-breakpoint execution time: %" PRIu64 " us\n", set_breakpoint_time);
> +	max_sleep_time = set_breakpoint_time * 11 / 10;
> +	igt_info("Maximum sleep_time: %" PRIu64 " us\n", max_sleep_time);
> +
> +	ts = (struct timespec) { };
> +	igt_nsec_elapsed(&ts);
> +
> +	while (igt_seconds_elapsed(&ts) < 60) {
> +		uint64_t event_count;
> +
> +		sleep_time = rand() % max_sleep_time;
> +		igt_debug("Loop %d: SIGINT after %" PRIu64 " us\n", ++loop_count, sleep_time);

This worries me. The loop count increment is inside of this macro and
even if it would work now, please change it to:

if (loop_count++ == 1) in below.

With that,
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

> +
> +		data = online_debug_data_create(hwe);
> +		s = xe_eudebug_session_create(fd, run_online_client, flags, data);
> +		xe_eudebug_debugger_add_trigger(s->debugger, DRM_XE_EUDEBUG_EVENT_OPEN,
> +						open_trigger);
> +		xe_eudebug_debugger_add_trigger(s->debugger, DRM_XE_EUDEBUG_EVENT_EXEC_QUEUE,
> +						exec_queue_trigger);
> +		xe_eudebug_debugger_add_trigger(s->debugger, DRM_XE_EUDEBUG_EVENT_VM,
> +						vm_open_trigger);
> +		xe_eudebug_debugger_add_trigger(s->debugger, DRM_XE_EUDEBUG_EVENT_METADATA,
> +						create_metadata_trigger);
> +		xe_eudebug_debugger_add_trigger(s->debugger, DRM_XE_EUDEBUG_EVENT_VM_BIND_UFENCE,
> +						ufence_ack_set_bp_trigger);
> +		xe_eudebug_debugger_add_trigger(s->debugger, DRM_XE_EUDEBUG_EVENT_EU_ATTENTION,
> +						eu_attention_resume_trigger);
> +
> +		igt_assert_eq(xe_eudebug_debugger_attach(s->debugger, s->client), 0);
> +		xe_eudebug_debugger_start_worker(s->debugger);
> +		igt_assert_eq(READ_ONCE(s->debugger->event_count), 0);
> +		xe_eudebug_client_start(s->client);
> +
> +		/* Sample max events without SIGINT */
> +		if (loop_count == 1)
> +			xe_eudebug_client_wait_done(s->client);
> +		else
> +			usleep(sleep_time);
> +
> +		event_count = READ_ONCE(s->debugger->event_count);
> +		if (event_count > events_max)
> +			events_max = event_count;
> +		else if (event_count > 0 && event_count < events_max)
> +			sigints_during_test++;
> +
> +		igt_assert_eq(pthread_kill(s->debugger->worker_thread, SIGINT), 0);
> +		close(s->debugger->fd);
> +
> +		igt_assert_eq(READ_ONCE(s->debugger->worker_state), DEBUGGER_WORKER_ACTIVE);
> +		WRITE_ONCE(s->debugger->worker_state, DEBUGGER_WORKER_INACTIVE);
> +
> +		xe_eudebug_client_wait_done(s->client);
> +
> +		xe_eudebug_event_log_print(s->debugger->log, true);
> +		xe_eudebug_event_log_print(s->client->log, true);
> +
> +		xe_eudebug_session_destroy(s);
> +		online_debug_data_destroy(data);
> +	}
> +
> +	igt_info("%d correctly timed SIGINTs in %d loops\n", sigints_during_test, loop_count);
> +	igt_assert_lt(0, sigints_during_test);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * SUBTEST: pagefault-read
>   * Description:
> @@ -2426,6 +2518,10 @@ igt_main
>  	test_gt_render_or_compute("set-breakpoint", fd, hwe)
>  		test_set_breakpoint_online(fd, hwe, SHADER_NOP | TRIGGER_UFENCE_SET_BREAKPOINT);
>  
> +	test_gt_render_or_compute("set-breakpoint-sigint-debugger", fd, hwe)
> +		test_set_breakpoint_online_sigint_debugger(fd, hwe,
> +							   SHADER_NOP | TRIGGER_UFENCE_SET_BREAKPOINT);
> +
>  	test_gt_render_or_compute("breakpoint-not-in-debug-mode", fd, hwe)
>  		test_basic_online(fd, hwe, SHADER_BREAKPOINT | DISABLE_DEBUG_MODE);
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-12 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-11 13:55 [PATCH v2 i-g-t 0/3] tests/xe_eudebug_online: Add set-breakpoint-sigint-debugger test Dominik Karol Piątkowski
2025-03-11 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 i-g-t 1/3] lib/eudebug: Make debugger thread SIGINTable Dominik Karol Piątkowski
2025-03-11 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 i-g-t 2/3] lib/eudebug: Fix xe_eudebug_client_stop corner case Dominik Karol Piątkowski
2025-03-11 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 i-g-t 3/3] tests/xe_eudebug_online: Add set-breakpoint-sigint-debugger test Dominik Karol Piątkowski
2025-03-12 13:10   ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2025-03-12 13:23     ` Mika Kuoppala
2025-03-12  2:07 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for tests/xe_eudebug_online: Add set-breakpoint-sigint-debugger test (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-12  2:26 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-12 14:03 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-03-12 17:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-13  7:06   ` Piatkowski, Dominik Karol

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87msdql7ig.fsf@mkuoppal-desk \
    --to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=christoph.manszewski@intel.com \
    --cc=dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com \
    --cc=dominik.karol.piatkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jan.sokolowski@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox