From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] xe_live_ktest: Use xe_live_test kernel module In-Reply-To: <11e1b3f4-b0ba-4095-96c6-f2bf18f27fd2@linux.intel.com> References: <20231205224926.2188996-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> <20231207164152.57be3d07@maurocar-mobl2> <3kunqgqyf7tobiwhcpvjp7rcvidrgnz2jq3qqoxjbl7kaftdq7@7hdweo57htff> <20240112093252.0a4bf850@maurocar-mobl2> <57epajumgzrllmyufx7233yjja2c3fbs2zgfflkhcspfvwak47@h64l4uzne54h> <11e1b3f4-b0ba-4095-96c6-f2bf18f27fd2@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:21:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87mst7rri8.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Lucas De Marchi Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org List-ID: On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On 1/12/24 15:29, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >>> On such case, you should document kunit_debugfs at Documentation/ABI. >> >> debugfs is not part of ABI. > > That's arguable. Check Documentation/ABI and you'll see several debugfs > nodes documented there. I guess you could argue documenting your debugfs under Documentation/ABI makes it ABI, but I'd avoid doing that. Usually we use debugfs precisely to avoid the burden of ABI and all the baggage that brings. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel