public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/i915: Restore some BAT coverage
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 15:02:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tvdl2xbd.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155859468552.28319.675115669918159870@skylake-alporthouse-com>

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-23 07:43:12)
>> 
>> On 23/05/2019 07:37, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> > 
>> > Engine enumerated test names have changed so fast-feedback.testlist needs
>> > to be updated. However listing all engines there won't scale. So instead
>> > add new tests cases which iterate all engines internally.
>> > 
>> > v2:
>> >   * Fix basic-all test name.
>> >   * Fix params to basic (bool false to zero).
>> >   * Use I915_EXEC_DEFAULT in has_extended_busy_ioctl to workaround stateful
>> >     contexts for now.
>> >   * Have only basic-all in BAT. (Chris)
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v1
>> > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> # v1
>> > ---
>> >   tests/i915/gem_busy.c                 | 19 +++++++++++----
>> >   tests/i915/gem_exec_basic.c           | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >   tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 31 ++-----------------------
>> >   3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_busy.c b/tests/i915/gem_busy.c
>> > index 781a3bfab1d1..f3ebb37a33b4 100644
>> > --- a/tests/i915/gem_busy.c
>> > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_busy.c
>> > @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static bool has_semaphores(int fd)
>> >   
>> >   static bool has_extended_busy_ioctl(int fd)
>> >   {
>> > -     igt_spin_t *spin = igt_spin_new(fd, .engine = I915_EXEC_RENDER);
>> > +     igt_spin_t *spin = igt_spin_new(fd, .engine = I915_EXEC_DEFAULT);
>> 
>> (This fails on platforms with only rcs0 (no other engines) due context 
>> has a map now, and I915_EXEC_RENDER == 1 == -EINVAL.)
>
> In which case, it probably should be a plain 0 as it no longer has the
> old EXEC_RING semantics but is just an index, i.e. igt_spin_new(fd);
>
>> We need to come up with a robust and easy to remember solution for 
>> dealing with the fact contexts are stateful now and 
>> __for_each_physical_engine iterator configures the default one.
>> 
>> Could end game for test conversion be to stop passing in eb.flags to 
>> igt_spin_new and do class:instance instead? That would enable dummyload 
>> to unambiguously know what to use, depending on get_engines query.
>
> Speak to Mika, we abuse igt_spin_t much more by resubmitting the same
> dummyload to multiple engines and contexts.

I have wandered there yes. The reason for this abuse is still unclear.
We could do a clearer interface for creating spinners but is the
reusage due to latency concerns?

-Mika
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-23 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-22 16:31 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915: Restore some BAT coverage Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-22 16:45 ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-22 18:48 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2019-05-22 21:28 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Andi Shyti
2019-05-23  6:37 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-23  6:43   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-23  6:58     ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-23 12:02       ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2019-05-23 12:08         ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-23 11:43   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-05-23  7:30 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for tests/i915: Restore some BAT coverage (rev2) Patchwork
2019-05-23 11:00 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/i915: Restore some BAT coverage (rev3) Patchwork
2019-05-23 14:27 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for tests/i915: Restore some BAT coverage Patchwork
2019-05-24  9:11 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for tests/i915: Restore some BAT coverage (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tvdl2xbd.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox