From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10368C2BD09 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA7010E05B; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WV8DOaPK"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E03410E05B for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:13:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1719875636; x=1751411636; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4L+VLxs4jpC2+fzRycJxdbs9Y/sIyh5DBpimGt5cS1w=; b=WV8DOaPKSTdZU1fElB1rT3hoda6Nuj/fxIS8OYqvB+2NlJ2S52HLAM0u OqFL/TRuM10g5PfOnv8HCE5SzQM5Ybp3KZcRfskSd6DaBNscnlITBV+Xr BJ4JY9AbaIOqGeCXn7Vc+eiIVnX6FTiDsbtqxP6hFtBFStkeAV+1Af2w2 ZQB8JxGR2D+0ucNH33O6reFlWqjxyrsEqHo5m6W96K9Hc64n+O/bm31En CC1hZ5mNZ54P6g+681lSFrRkxbLebWI00TXjJgSKrNujDR+KDljN4NS2R gWdTJXbgAOwhkK/LpV9rdAzsX7x/qwHDyfhBZ+/W05wzsVgtExbAtCN3S g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: QnBHteDkShKI57zR1OxeLQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5rbHwKmJTSO18qYRnZ/ZTw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11120"; a="17154638" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,177,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="17154638" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jul 2024 16:13:55 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: pFyAKy7FTSiGsaUWbnIEUQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gFDZT6IqTjyJvDH4lGthfA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,177,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="45763389" Received: from smuley-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO adixit-arch.intel.com) ([10.125.32.45]) by fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jul 2024 16:13:54 -0700 Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 16:08:52 -0700 Message-ID: <87v81oaewr.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?4pyX?= CI.xeFULL: failure for Intel Xe OA IGT's (rev7) In-Reply-To: References: <20240701025309.2416653-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> <171981000526.459.15402300389873156169@2413ebb6fbb6> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/29.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development mailing list for IGT GPU Tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 12:56:28 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote: > > > IGT changes > > > > Possible regressions > > > > *=A0igt@kms_pm_rpm@i2c: > > > > *=A0shard-dg2-set2: [3]PASS -> [4]FAIL > > > > *=A0{igt@xe_oa@non-zero-reason@rcs-0} (NEW): > > > > *=A0shard-dg2-set2: NOTRUN -> [5]FAIL +1 other test fail > > This is something that is an open bug even in i915 and will fail with Xe = as > well. Should we even merge this test as it will create a bunch of JIRAs > every now and then. I am also thinking what to do about these failures. There are more in "CI.xeBAT" (since the HAX patch added the tests to xe-fast-feedback.testlist, though this will not happen in real CI): Possible regressions * {igt@xe_oa@mi-rpc} (NEW): * bat-atsm-2: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE +1 other test incomplete * {igt@xe_oa@mi-rpc@ccs-0} (NEW): * bat-pvc-2: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE +1 other test incomplete * bat-dg2-oem2: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE +1 other test incomplete * {igt@xe_oa@mmio-triggered-reports} (NEW): * bat-adlp-7: NOTRUN -> SKIP * {igt@xe_oa@non-zero-reason} (NEW): * bat-pvc-2: NOTRUN -> FAIL +6 other tests fail * bat-dg2-oem2: NOTRUN -> FAIL +1 other test fail * {igt@xe_oa@oa-formats} (NEW): * bat-pvc-2: NOTRUN -> TIMEOUT +1 other test timeout * {igt@xe_oa@oa-tlb-invalidate} (NEW): * {bat-lnl-1}: NOTRUN -> SKIP +1 other test skip * bat-pvc-2: NOTRUN -> SKIP +1 other test skip * {igt@xe_oa@polling-small-buf} (NEW): * bat-atsm-2: NOTRUN -> FAIL * {igt@xe_oa@rc6-disable} (NEW): * bat-atsm-2: NOTRUN -> SKIP Mostly similar to those we see in i915 for Xe1. One idea is to run these xe_oa IGT's only for Xe2 where things seem to be more stable, that is only for xe KMD supported platforms. Things seem to be more stable for Xe2, maybe because we don't know how to check Xe2 PEC counters, like we do for Xe1 in sanity_check_reports. Or simplify the checks for Xe1, e.g. get rid of sanity_check_reports? And simplify some of the other asserts. Or merge these first and as part of fixing the bugs see what to do for the tests, so that we'll have a record in git of what we did and why? Thanks. -- Ashutosh