From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD226E8E8 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 23:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:31:28 -0700 Message-ID: <87wnoohqgf.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" In-Reply-To: <20210813074703.18778-8-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> References: <20210813074703.18778-1-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> <20210813074703.18778-8-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 7/9] tests/gem_exec_flush: Adopt to no-reloc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" To: Zbigniew =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Kempczy=F1ski?= Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Petri Latvala List-ID: On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:47:01 -0700, Zbigniew Kempczy=F1ski wrote: > > Test uses "warming" execbuf which direct consequence is each child > will have objects pinned in gtt before core of the test is performed. > For gens with ppgtt we don't expect relocations so we can just add > EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED flag. We can do this due to each batch created > uses above offsets already. Thanks for the explanation. Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit