From: "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/intel/kms_pm_rpm: Update cursor_fb3 framebuffer creation format
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:31:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8af2561a-2b0d-4c69-8f01-3012e3db8ab8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z0TAXl62KunlTuxl@intel.com>
Hi Rodrigo,
On 25-11-2024 11:52 pm, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 10:40:28PM +0530, Jeevan B wrote:
>> Updated cursor_fb3 framebuffer creation in the cursor subtest function
>> to use linear tiling instead of x-tile. As x-tile is no longer supported
>> on latest platforms.
> Shouldn't we then add a new format without removing the old ones?
> Otherwise it looks like you are removing coverage on old platforms.
Is there any specific reason why x tiling was used initially? Any idea?
Isn't linear tiling common across all platforms?
>> Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/intel/kms_pm_rpm.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_pm_rpm.c b/tests/intel/kms_pm_rpm.c
>> index 990c50915..aeeaf69f7 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/kms_pm_rpm.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_pm_rpm.c
>> @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static void cursor_subtest(bool dpms)
>> igt_create_fb(drm_fd, 64, 64, DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888,
>> DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR, &cursor_fb2);
>> igt_create_fb(drm_fd, 64, 64, DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
>> - I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED, &cursor_fb3);
>> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR, &cursor_fb3);
>>
>> fill_igt_fb(&cursor_fb1, 0xFF00FFFF);
>> fill_igt_fb(&cursor_fb2, 0xFF00FF00);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-25 17:10 [PATCH] tests/intel/kms_pm_rpm: Update cursor_fb3 framebuffer creation format Jeevan B
2024-11-25 18:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-26 12:01 ` Sharma, Swati2 [this message]
2024-11-29 8:11 ` Juha-Pekka Heikkilä
2024-11-26 0:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-11-26 0:48 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-26 2:19 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-26 4:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8af2561a-2b0d-4c69-8f01-3012e3db8ab8@intel.com \
--to=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jeevan.b@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox