From: "Mun, Gwan-gyeong" <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
To: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_fbcon_fbt: Reduce execution time by not calling wait_until_enabled()
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:43:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9314204ffbef2e7425ea7f03cd9183e2db1f703a.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408201925.31566-2-jose.souza@intel.com>
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 13:19 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> After unset all CRTCs is expected that FBC and PSR is disabled,
> calling wait_until_enabled() will make it wait until timeout to it
> return false and pass the test.
>
> So instead lets implement is_disabled() hook, as the
> kmstest_unset_all_crtcs() is a synchronous call, the features will
> be already disabled after it, so no need to do any wait.
>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_psr.c | 10 ++++++++++
> lib/igt_psr.h | 1 +
> tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.c b/lib/igt_psr.c
> index 83ccacdd..f92eff6c 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_psr.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_psr.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,16 @@
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> #include <errno.h>
>
> +bool psr_disabled_check(int debugfs_fd)
> +{
> + char buf[PSR_STATUS_MAX_LEN];
> +
> + igt_debugfs_simple_read(debugfs_fd, "i915_edp_psr_status", buf,
> + sizeof(buf));
> +
> + return strstr(buf, "PSR mode: disabled\n");
> +}
> +
> static bool psr_active_check(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode)
> {
> char buf[PSR_STATUS_MAX_LEN];
> diff --git a/lib/igt_psr.h b/lib/igt_psr.h
> index ca385736..02ce760b 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_psr.h
> +++ b/lib/igt_psr.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ enum psr_mode {
> PSR_MODE_2
> };
>
> +bool psr_disabled_check(int debugfs_fd);
> bool psr_wait_entry(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode);
> bool psr_wait_update(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode);
> bool psr_long_wait_update(int debugfs_fd, enum psr_mode mode);
> diff --git a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> index 546dff99..143be3e3 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_fbcon_fbt.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,14 @@ static bool fbc_wait_until_enabled(int
> debugfs_fd)
> return r;
> }
>
> +static bool fbc_is_disabled(int debugfs_fd)
> +{
> + bool r = fbc_check_status(debugfs_fd, false);
> +
> + fbc_print_status(debugfs_fd);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> static bool fbc_wait_until_disabled(int debugfs_fd)
> {
> bool r = igt_wait(fbc_check_status(debugfs_fd, false), 5000,
> 1);
> @@ -250,6 +258,14 @@ static bool psr_wait_until_enabled(int
> debugfs_fd)
> return r;
> }
>
> +static bool psr_is_disabled(int debugfs_fd)
> +{
> + bool r = psr_disabled_check(debugfs_fd);
> +
> + psr_print_status(debugfs_fd);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> static bool psr_supported_on_chipset(int debugfs_fd)
> {
> return psr_sink_support(debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1);
> @@ -280,18 +296,21 @@ static inline void psr_debugfs_enable(int
> debugfs_fd)
> struct feature {
> bool (*supported_on_chipset)(int debugfs_fd);
> bool (*wait_until_enabled)(int debugfs_fd);
> + bool (*is_disabled)(int debugfs_fd);
> bool (*wait_until_update)(struct drm_info *drm);
> bool (*connector_possible_fn)(drmModeConnectorPtr connector);
> void (*enable)(int debugfs_fd);
> } fbc = {
> .supported_on_chipset = fbc_supported_on_chipset,
> .wait_until_enabled = fbc_wait_until_enabled,
> + .is_disabled = fbc_is_disabled,
> .wait_until_update = fbc_wait_until_update,
> .connector_possible_fn = connector_can_fbc,
> .enable = fbc_modparam_enable,
> }, psr = {
> .supported_on_chipset = psr_supported_on_chipset,
> .wait_until_enabled = psr_wait_until_enabled,
> + .is_disabled = psr_is_disabled,
> .wait_until_update = psr_wait_until_update,
> .connector_possible_fn = connector_can_psr,
> .enable = psr_debugfs_enable,
> @@ -310,7 +329,7 @@ static void subtest(struct drm_info *drm, struct
> feature *feature, bool suspend)
>
> kmstest_unset_all_crtcs(drm->fd, drm->res);
> wait_user("Modes unset.");
> - igt_assert(!feature->wait_until_enabled(drm->debugfs_fd));
> + igt_assert(feature->is_disabled(drm->debugfs_fd));
>
> set_mode_for_one_screen(drm, &fb, feature-
> >connector_possible_fn);
> wait_user("Screen set.");
looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-30 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 20:19 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_fbcon_fbt: Make FBC wait_until_update() more reliable José Roberto de Souza
2020-04-08 20:19 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_fbcon_fbt: Reduce execution time by not calling wait_until_enabled() José Roberto de Souza
2020-04-29 15:01 ` Imre Deak
2020-04-30 6:43 ` Mun, Gwan-gyeong [this message]
2020-04-08 22:13 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] tests/kms_fbcon_fbt: Make FBC wait_until_update() more reliable Patchwork
2020-04-09 0:42 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] tests/kms_fbcon_fbt: Make FBC wait_until_update() more reliable (rev2) Patchwork
2020-04-09 12:41 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-04-11 3:42 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] tests/kms_fbcon_fbt: Make FBC wait_until_update() more reliable (rev3) Patchwork
2020-04-11 10:30 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-04-29 15:00 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_fbcon_fbt: Make FBC wait_until_update() more reliable Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9314204ffbef2e7425ea7f03cd9183e2db1f703a.camel@intel.com \
--to=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox