Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dong, Zhanjun" <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
To: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>,
	<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Lukasz Laguna" <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>,
	"Michał Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe_exec_capture: Skip checks on VF devices
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:45:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9937b0e4-fe26-468d-aed2-0430f4459389@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250219115314.180382-3-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>

LGTM
Reviewed-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>

Regards,
Zhanjun Dong


On 2025-02-19 6:53 a.m., Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
> If the device is a Virtual Function, skip certain devcoredump validation
> steps that are not applicable in this context.
> 
> These changes align with kernel updates introduced in:
> 
> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241022010116.342240-2-zhanjun.dong@intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
> Cc: Michał Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/intel/xe_exec_capture.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_capture.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_capture.c
> index 2c79c1802..fe1ae677e 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_capture.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_capture.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>   
>   #include "igt.h"
>   #include "igt_device.h"
> +#include "igt_sriov_device.h"
>   #include "igt_sysfs.h"
>   #include "lib/igt_syncobj.h"
>   #include "lib/intel_reg.h"
> @@ -434,6 +435,7 @@ static void test_card(int fd)
>   	char *single_line_buf =  (char *)malloc(LINE_BUF_SIZE);
>   	char temp[MAX_TEMP_LEN];
>   	char path[MAX_SYSFS_PATH_LEN];
> +	const bool is_vf_device = intel_is_vf_device(fd);
>   
>   	igt_assert_f(single_line_buf, "Out of memory.\n");
>   
> @@ -466,19 +468,27 @@ static void test_card(int fd)
>   		igt_assert_f((start_line = access_devcoredump(path, lines, single_line_buf)) > 0,
>   			     "Devcoredump not exist, errno=%d.\n", errno);
>   
> -		sprintf(temp, "instance=%d", hwe->engine_instance);
> -		check_item_str(&regex, lines, "(physical),", INDEX_ENGINE_PHYSICAL,
> -			       INDEX_ENGINE_INSTANCE, temp, false);
> -		check_item_str(&regex, lines, "(physical),", INDEX_ENGINE_PHYSICAL,
> -			       INDEX_ENGINE_NAME, xe_engine_class_name(hwe->engine_class), true);
> -
> -		check_item_str(&regex, lines, "Capture_source:", INDEX_KEY, INDEX_VALUE,
> -			       "GuC", false);
> -
> -		check_item_u64(&regex, lines, "ACTHD:", addr,
> -			       addr + BATCH_DW_COUNT * sizeof(u32), INDEX_KEY, INDEX_VALUE);
> -		check_item_u64(&regex, lines, "RING_BBADDR:", addr,
> -			       addr + BATCH_DW_COUNT * sizeof(u32), INDEX_KEY, INDEX_VALUE);
> +		if (!is_vf_device) {
> +			sprintf(temp, "instance=%d", hwe->engine_instance);
> +			check_item_str(&regex, lines, "(physical),",
> +				       INDEX_ENGINE_PHYSICAL,
> +				       INDEX_ENGINE_INSTANCE, temp, false);
> +			check_item_str(&regex, lines, "(physical),",
> +				       INDEX_ENGINE_PHYSICAL, INDEX_ENGINE_NAME,
> +				       xe_engine_class_name(hwe->engine_class),
> +				       true);
> +
> +			check_item_str(&regex, lines,
> +				       "Capture_source:", INDEX_KEY,
> +				       INDEX_VALUE, "GuC", false);
> +
> +			check_item_u64(&regex, lines, "ACTHD:", addr,
> +				       addr + BATCH_DW_COUNT * sizeof(u32),
> +				       INDEX_KEY, INDEX_VALUE);
> +			check_item_u64(&regex, lines, "RING_BBADDR:", addr,
> +				       addr + BATCH_DW_COUNT * sizeof(u32),
> +				       INDEX_KEY, INDEX_VALUE);
> +		}
>   		check_item_u64(&regex, lines, "length:", addr,
>   			       addr + BATCH_DW_COUNT * sizeof(u32), INDEX_VALUE, INDEX_KEY);
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-21 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19 11:53 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Add VF detection and skip devcoredump checks on VFs Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-02-19 11:53 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/igt_sriov_device: Add intel_is_vf_device helper Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-03-03  8:20   ` Laguna, Lukasz
2025-03-03 15:44     ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2025-03-04  7:24       ` Laguna, Lukasz
2025-02-19 11:53 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe_exec_capture: Skip checks on VF devices Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-02-21 16:45   ` Dong, Zhanjun [this message]
2025-02-19 23:33 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Add VF detection and skip devcoredump checks on VFs Patchwork
2025-02-19 23:50 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-20 11:30 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-20 21:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9937b0e4-fe26-468d-aed2-0430f4459389@intel.com \
    --to=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
    --cc=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox