From: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 03/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: fix scaling of period steps
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 11:31:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c9dec58-f453-6251-eef9-618433d46467@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <856aad30-db03-4fe7-e70b-8b7926ebb7c7@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 9/29/2023 10:01 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 28/09/2023 18:45, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
>> Period steps take scale time (-F) command line option into account.
>
> "Make period steps.."?
>
> "Periods steps should take.."?
>
>> This allows to scale workload without need to modify .wsim file
>>
>> ex. having following example.wsim
>>
>> 1.VCS1.3000.0.1
>> 1.RCS.500-1000.-1.0
>> 1.RCS.3700.0.0
>> 1.RCS.1000.-2.0
>> 1.VCS2.2300.-2.0
>> 1.RCS.4700.-1.0
>> 1.VCS2.600.-1.1
>> p.16000
>>
>> we can scale the whole workload x10 with:
>>
>> gem_wsim -w example.wsim -f 10 -F 10
>>
>> -f is for batch duration steps, -F for period and delay steps
>
> Actually I am having a little bit of a second thought here. Thinking
> that perhaps it was deliberate to not scale periods.
>
> Think of it like this. -f 0.5 simulates a twice as fast GPU. -F 2
> simulates a twice as slow CPU.
>
> In both cases if something wants to hit 60 fps, it still wants to hit 60
> fps. What use case for scaling the period do you have in mind?
>
That gives another view on the matter.
I thought about it more like having a common unit, so giving -F 1000 ->
makes all CPU values (Period/Duration) are given in ms.
-f option may be used to calibrate for difference between GPU and CPU
ex. if wrongly reported freq makes a real GPU duration 10x faster than
CPU measured (ex. 10ms specified batch duration takes 1ms in reality) we
can provide -f 10 and still have GPU durations correspond to CPU time.
Regards,
marcin
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>> v2:
>> - apply same approach as with DELAY step (Tvrtko)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> index 42690d3d0..41557517c 100644
>> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> @@ -1186,6 +1186,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int
>> flags, double scale_dur,
>> add_step:
>> if (step.type == DELAY)
>> step.delay = __duration(step.delay, scale_time);
>> + else if (step.type == PERIOD)
>> + step.period = __duration(step.period, scale_time);
>> step.idx = nr_steps++;
>> step.request = -1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-29 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 17:45 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 00/17] [RFC] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 01/17] lib/igt_device_scan: Xe get integrated/discrete card functions Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-10-05 12:17 ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 02/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: reposition the unbound duration boolean Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 03/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: fix scaling of period steps Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 8:01 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-29 9:31 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin [this message]
2023-09-29 10:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-29 11:30 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 04/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: fix duration range check Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 05/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: extract duration parsing code to new function Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 8:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 06/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: fix conflicting SSEU #define and enum Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 07/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: cleanups Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 8:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 08/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: reposition repeat_start variable Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 09/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: use lib code to query engines Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 8:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-29 10:35 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 10/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: allow comments in workload description files Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 8:28 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 11/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: introduce w_step_sync function Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 12/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: extract allocate and prepare contexts code to new functions Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 9:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 13/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: extract prepare working sets code to new function Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 14/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: group i915 fields Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 9:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 15/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: introduce bb_size in w_step Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 9:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-29 10:08 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-29 10:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-10-05 10:52 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-10-05 12:30 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 16/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: for_each_dep macro Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 9:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-28 17:45 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 17/17] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-29 10:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-29 15:53 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-28 18:59 ` [igt-dev] ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support (rev5) Patchwork
2023-09-28 19:10 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c9dec58-f453-6251-eef9-618433d46467@linux.intel.com \
--to=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox