From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [v4 4/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Downscaling each plane
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:43:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgwQZUqPu5J5Ke54@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215122344.11168-5-swati2.sharma@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 05:53:39PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
> Subtest for testing downscaling for each plane
> individually (checked 1 plane per "class" like
> we do in other tests).
>
> v2: -set modifier as LINEAR (Ville)
> -shared code for upscaling and downscaling tests (Ville)
> -removed num_scaler() check and added try_commit() (Ville)
>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_plane_scaling.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> index 39f2de3c..e960a6c5 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test display plane scaling");
> /* Test flags. */
> enum {
> TEST_UPSCALING = 1 << 0,
> + TEST_DOWNSCALING = 1 << 1,
> };
>
> typedef struct {
> @@ -266,6 +267,48 @@ __test_plane_upscaling(data_t *d, igt_plane_t *plane,
> igt_skip_on_f(ret == -EINVAL, "Scaling op not supported\n");
> }
>
> +static void
> +__test_plane_downscaling(data_t *d, igt_plane_t *plane,
> + enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output)
> +{
> + igt_display_t *display = &d->display;
> + int width, height;
> + drmModeModeInfo *mode;
> + bool test_complete = false;
> + int scaling = 50;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cleanup_crtc(d);
> +
> + igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
> + mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
> + width = mode->hdisplay;
> + height = mode->vdisplay;
> +
> + igt_create_color_pattern_fb(display->drm_fd,
> + width, height,
> + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> + I915_TILING_NONE,
> + 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, &d->fb[0]);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &d->fb[0]);
> +
> + while(!test_complete) {
> + igt_plane_set_size(plane, (width * scaling) / 100, (height * scaling) / 100);
> + ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(display, DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET, NULL);
> +
> + if (ret != -EINVAL)
> + test_complete = true;
> +
> + scaling += 5;
This looks like it could go on forever.
> + }
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> + igt_remove_fb(display->drm_fd, &d->fb[0]);
> +
> + igt_skip_on_f(ret == -EINVAL, "Scaling op not supported\n");
> +}
> +
> static void
> test_plane_scaling(data_t *d, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
> {
> @@ -285,9 +328,12 @@ test_plane_scaling(data_t *d, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t fla
> uint32_t format = plane->drm_plane->formats[j];
> if (test_format(d, &tested_formats, format) &&
> igt_plane_has_format_mod(plane, format, modifier) &&
> - can_scale(d, format))
> + can_scale(d, format)) {
> if (flags & TEST_UPSCALING)
> __test_plane_upscaling(d, plane, pipe, output);
> + if (flags & TEST_DOWNSCALING)
> + __test_plane_downscaling(d, plane, pipe, output);
> + }
> }
>
> igt_vec_fini(&tested_formats);
> @@ -618,6 +664,13 @@ igt_main_args("", long_opts, help_str, opt_handler, &data)
> test_plane_scaling(&data, pipe, output, TEST_UPSCALING);
> }
>
> + igt_describe("Tests plane downscaling.");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("plane-downscaling") {
> + for_each_pipe_with_single_output(&data.display, pipe, output)
> + igt_dynamic_f("pipe-%s-%s-downscaling", kmstest_pipe_name(pipe), igt_output_name(output))
> + test_plane_scaling(&data, pipe, output, TEST_DOWNSCALING);
> + }
> +
> igt_describe("Tests scaling with pixel formats.");
> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("scaler-with-pixel-format") {
> for_each_pipe_with_single_output(&data.display, pipe, output)
> --
> 2.25.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 12:23 [igt-dev] [v4 0/9] Addition of new plane scaling test cases Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 12:23 ` [igt-dev] [v4 1/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Removal of plane-scaling subtest Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 12:23 ` [igt-dev] [v4 2/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Add output name in dynamic subtests Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 12:23 ` [igt-dev] [v4 3/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Upscaling each plane Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 20:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 12:23 ` [igt-dev] [v4 4/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Downscaling " Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 20:43 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
[not found] ` <a85c6701-43ad-4b25-6184-8798e8db2e2d@quicinc.com>
2022-02-17 12:15 ` Sharma, Swati2
2022-02-17 18:22 ` Jessica Zhang
2022-02-17 18:37 ` Sharma, Swati2
2022-02-22 19:36 ` Jessica Zhang
2022-02-23 6:46 ` Sharma, Swati2
2022-02-15 12:23 ` [igt-dev] [v4 5/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Upscaling on 2 planes Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 20:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 12:23 ` [igt-dev] [v4 6/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Downscaling " Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 12:23 ` [igt-dev] [v4 7/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Upscaling and downscaling scenario Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 12:23 ` [igt-dev] [v4 8/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Add negative test to check num of scalers Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 12:23 ` [igt-dev] [v4 9/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Refactor clipping-clamping subtest Swati Sharma
2022-02-15 18:23 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Addition of new plane scaling test cases (rev6) Patchwork
2022-02-15 21:59 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgwQZUqPu5J5Ke54@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox