From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41AD110F658 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 16:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 18:01:01 +0200 From: Kamil Konieczny To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Message-ID: References: <20220426052331.3453-1-sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com> <20220426052331.3453-2-sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220426052331.3453-2-sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com> Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop: added description for test case List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sai Gowtham Ch Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: Hi Sai, On 2022-04-26 at 10:53:30 +0530, sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com wrote: > From: Ch Sai Gowtham > > Added test description for subtest that are available. > > Cc: Kamil Konieczny > Signed-off-by: Ch Sai Gowtham ---------------- ^ Correct this (see my other letter on gem_partial_pwrite_pread). > --- > tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c b/tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c > index 983605e3..070e767f 100644 > --- a/tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c > @@ -183,9 +183,13 @@ igt_main > igt_skip_on(devid == PCI_CHIP_I965_G); /* has totally broken pipe control */ > } > > + igt_describe("checks tlb consistency of the pipe_control target so creates new buffer" --------------------- ^ Use capital letter at begin of sentence, so s/checks/Checks/ > + " each time, emit commands and send it to ring for execution and target" > + " buffer won't get reused."); Looks a little too long, you do not need to describe every single step used, so imho shorten this to something like igt_describe("Checks tlb consistency of the pipe_control with fresh buffer."); should be ok. > igt_subtest("fresh-buffer") > store_pipe_control_loop(false, 2); > > + igt_describe("Emit commands in reused buffer and send it to ring for execution."); Here just reuse previous one with s/fresh/reused/ buffer change. Regards, Kamil > igt_subtest("reused-buffer") > store_pipe_control_loop(true, 2); > > -- > 2.35.1 >