From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Mohammed Thasleem <mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 18:26:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-LZRvxk0ec3dA9y@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312210437.7304-1-mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:34:36AM +0530, Mohammed Thasleem wrote:
> DC6 counter was removed MTL onwards, so pkc10 counter is used
> to validated DC6 tests but with the new approach of kmd changes
> created DC6 debugfs entry counter to validated DC6 tests and
> removeing the existing pkc10 code.
>
> v2: Update debugfs message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Thasleem <mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c | 78 ++++++++++-------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c b/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c
> index 1b10c7959..658ba0564 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ static uint32_t read_dc_counter(uint32_t debugfs_fd, int dc_flag)
> {
> char buf[4096];
> char *str;
> + data_t data = {};
>
> igt_debugfs_simple_read(debugfs_fd, "i915_dmc_info", buf, sizeof(buf));
>
> @@ -281,8 +282,14 @@ static uint32_t read_dc_counter(uint32_t debugfs_fd, int dc_flag)
> str = strstr(buf, "DC3 -> DC5 count");
> igt_assert_f(str, "DC5 counter is not available\n");
> } else if (dc_flag & CHECK_DC6) {
> - str = strstr(buf, "DC5 -> DC6 count");
> - igt_assert_f(str, "DC6 counter is not available\n");
> + if (intel_display_ver(data.devid) >= 14) {
> + str = strstr(buf, "DC5 -> DC6 allowed count");
> + igt_assert_f(str, "DC5 -> DC6 allowed count "
> + "is not available\n");
> + } else {
> + str = strstr(buf, "DC5 -> DC6 count");
> + igt_assert_f(str, "DC6 counter is not available\n");
> + }
Could the above not depend on the display device version? It could look
first for the real DC6 counter, fallback to the DC6-allowed counter and
fail if neither is found.
> } else if (dc_flag & CHECK_DC3CO) {
> str = strstr(buf, "DC3CO count");
> igt_assert_f(str, "DC3CO counter is not available\n");
> @@ -374,6 +381,7 @@ static void check_dc3co_with_videoplayback_like_load(data_t *data)
> static void require_dc_counter(int debugfs_fd, int dc_flag)
> {
> char buf[4096];
> + data_t data = {};
>
> igt_debugfs_simple_read(debugfs_fd, "i915_dmc_info",
> buf, sizeof(buf));
> @@ -388,8 +396,12 @@ static void require_dc_counter(int debugfs_fd, int dc_flag)
> "DC5 counter is not available\n");
> break;
> case CHECK_DC6:
> - igt_skip_on_f(!strstr(buf, "DC5 -> DC6 count"),
> - "DC6 counter is not available\n");
> + if (intel_display_ver(data.devid) >= 14)
> + igt_skip_on_f(!strstr(buf, "DC5 -> DC6 allowed count"),
> + "DC5 -> DC6 allowed count is not available\n");
> + else
> + igt_skip_on_f(!strstr(buf, "DC5 -> DC6 count"),
> + "DC6 counter is not available\n");
The same as above.
> break;
> default:
> igt_assert_f(0, "Unknown DC counter %d\n", dc_flag);
> @@ -414,20 +426,6 @@ static void test_dc3co_vpb_simulation(data_t *data)
> cleanup_dc3co_fbs(data);
> }
>
> -static void psr_dpms(data_t *data, int mode)
> -{
> - igt_output_t *output;
> -
> - for_each_connected_output(&data->display, output) {
> - drmModeConnectorPtr connector = output->config.connector;
> -
> - if (connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> - continue;
> -
> - kmstest_set_connector_dpms(data->drm_fd, connector, mode);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static void test_dc5_retention_flops(data_t *data, int dc_flag)
> {
> uint32_t dc_counter_before_psr;
> @@ -718,40 +716,6 @@ static void test_deep_pkgc_state(data_t *data)
> igt_assert_f(pkgc_flag, "PKGC10 is not achieved.\n");
> }
>
> -static void test_pkgc_state_dpms(data_t *data)
> -{
> - unsigned int timeout_sec = 6;
> - unsigned int prev_value = 0, cur_value = 0;
> -
> - prev_value = read_pkgc_counter(data->debugfs_root_fd);
> - setup_dc_dpms(data);
> - dpms_off(data);
> - igt_wait((cur_value = read_pkgc_counter(data->debugfs_root_fd)) > prev_value,
> - timeout_sec * 1000, 100);
> - igt_assert_f(cur_value > prev_value, "PKGC10 is not achieved.\n");
> - dpms_on(data);
> - cleanup_dc_dpms(data);
> -}
> -
> -static void test_pkgc_state_psr(data_t *data)
> -{
> - unsigned int timeout_sec = 6;
> - unsigned int prev_value = 0, cur_value = 0;
> -
> - prev_value = read_pkgc_counter(data->debugfs_root_fd);
> - setup_output(data);
> - setup_primary(data);
> - igt_require(!psr_disabled_check(data->debugfs_fd));
> - igt_assert(psr_wait_entry(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode, NULL));
> - psr_dpms(data, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
> - igt_wait((cur_value = read_pkgc_counter(data->debugfs_root_fd)) > prev_value,
> - timeout_sec * 1000, 100);
> - igt_assert_f(cur_value > prev_value, "PKGC10 is not achieved.\n");
> - psr_sink_error_check(data->debugfs_fd, data->op_psr_mode, data->output);
> - psr_dpms(data, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
> - cleanup_dc_psr(data);
> -}
> -
> static void kms_poll_state_restore(int sig)
> {
> int sysfs_fd;
> @@ -815,10 +779,7 @@ igt_main
> psr_enable(data.drm_fd, data.debugfs_fd, data.op_psr_mode, NULL);
> igt_require_f(igt_pm_pc8_plus_residencies_enabled(data.msr_fd),
> "PC8+ residencies not supported\n");
> - if (intel_display_ver(data.devid) >= 14)
> - test_pkgc_state_psr(&data);
> - else
> - test_dc_state_psr(&data, CHECK_DC6);
> + test_dc_state_psr(&data, CHECK_DC6);
> }
>
> igt_describe("This test validates display engine entry to PKGC10 state "
> @@ -863,10 +824,7 @@ igt_main
> igt_subtest("dc6-dpms") {
> igt_require_f(igt_pm_pc8_plus_residencies_enabled(data.msr_fd),
> "PC8+ residencies not supported\n");
> - if (intel_display_ver(data.devid) >= 14)
> - test_pkgc_state_dpms(&data);
> - else
> - test_dc_state_dpms(&data, CHECK_DC6);
> + test_dc_state_dpms(&data, CHECK_DC6);
>
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-17 17:08 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 Mohammed Thasleem
2025-02-17 19:43 ` ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for " Patchwork
2025-02-17 19:56 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-17 20:13 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-18 0:54 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-18 12:14 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-03-12 21:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-25 16:26 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2025-03-13 3:59 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-13 4:22 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-14 11:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-03-30 10:28 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3] tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKGC10 dependency to validate DC6 Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-30 10:45 ` Mohammed Thasleem
2025-03-31 10:13 ` Imre Deak
2025-03-30 11:26 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev3) Patchwork
2025-03-30 11:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-30 11:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev4) Patchwork
2025-03-30 12:00 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-30 12:44 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev3) Patchwork
2025-03-30 13:02 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-30 13:24 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev4) Patchwork
2025-03-30 13:57 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-06 18:15 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4] tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKGC10 dependency to validate DC6 Mohammed Thasleem
2025-04-07 14:04 ` Imre Deak
2025-04-06 19:02 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev5) Patchwork
2025-04-06 19:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-06 20:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev3) Patchwork
2025-04-06 21:02 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev5) Patchwork
2025-04-06 21:09 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev4) Patchwork
2025-04-07 23:18 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev5) Patchwork
2025-04-08 21:45 ` [PATCH i-g-t v5] tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKGC10 dependency to validate DC6 Mohammed Thasleem
2025-04-10 10:35 ` Imre Deak
2025-04-08 23:29 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Remove PKC10 dependecy to validate DC6 (rev6) Patchwork
2025-04-08 23:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-09 0:51 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-09 1:20 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-11 12:11 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-LZRvxk0ec3dA9y@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mohammed.thasleem@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox