Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, badal.nilawar@intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 1/2] tests/intel/xe_guc_pc: Add freq-power test
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 11:58:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQxoC9wD5luCg0wI@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230921085508.2926812-2-riana.tauro@intel.com>

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 02:25:07PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> An assumption is that at lower frequencies,
> not only do we run slower, but we save power compared to
> higher frequencies.
> 
> This test runs a spinner and sets the min and max frequencies
> to rp0 and rpn respectively. It then checks if power consumed
> at lower frequencies is lesser than higher frequencies.
> 
> v2: Remove Run Type
>     change test name (Kamil)
>     change test documentation and comments (Vinay)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c b/tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c
> index 0327d8e0e..2b3d08fcb 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_guc_pc.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  
>  #include "igt.h"
>  #include "lib/igt_syncobj.h"
> +#include "igt_power.h"
>  #include "igt_sysfs.h"
>  
>  #include "xe_drm.h"
> @@ -382,6 +383,82 @@ static void test_reset(int fd, int gt_id, int cycles)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static int cmp_u64(const void *a, const void *b)
> +{
> +	return (*(u64 *)a - *(u64 *)b);
> +}
> +
> +static uint64_t measure_power(int fd, struct igt_power *gpu)
> +{
> +	struct power_sample sample[2];
> +	uint64_t power[5];
> +
> +	for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> +		igt_power_get_energy(gpu, &sample[0]);
> +		usleep(10000); /* 10 ms */
> +		igt_power_get_energy(gpu, &sample[1]);
> +
> +		power[i] = igt_power_get_mW(gpu, &sample[0], &sample[1]);
> +	}
> +	/* Sort in ascending order and use a triangular filter */
> +	qsort(power, 5, sizeof(*power), cmp_u64);
> +	return DIV_ROUND_UP(power[1] + 2 * power[2] + power[3], 4);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * SUBTEST: freq-power
> + * Description: Validates power consumed at higher frequencies is more than
> + *              power consumed at lower frequencies.
> + */
> +static void test_freq_power(int fd, int gt_id, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> +{
> +	uint32_t rp0, rpn, vm;
> +	uint64_t ahnd;
> +	struct igt_power gpu;
> +	struct {
> +		uint64_t power;
> +		uint32_t freq;
> +	} min, max;
> +	igt_spin_t *spin;
> +
> +	/* Run for engines belonging to the gt */
> +	if (gt_id != hwe->gt_id)
> +		return;
> +
> +	igt_power_open(fd, &gpu, "gpu");
> +
> +	rpn = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpn");
> +	rp0 = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rp0");
> +
> +	vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
> +	ahnd = intel_allocator_open(fd, vm, INTEL_ALLOCATOR_RELOC);
> +	spin = igt_spin_new(fd, .ahnd = ahnd, .vm = vm, .hwe = hwe);
> +
> +	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpn) > 0);
> +	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpn) > 0);
> +	min.freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act");
> +	min.power = measure_power(fd, &gpu);
> +
> +	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rp0) > 0);
> +	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rp0) > 0);
> +	max.freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act");
> +	max.power = measure_power(fd, &gpu);
> +
> +	igt_info("Engine %s:%d  min:%lumW @ %uMHz, max:%lumW @ %uMHz\n",
> +		 xe_engine_class_string(hwe->engine_class), hwe->engine_instance,
> +		 min.power, min.freq, max.power, max.freq);
> +
> +	igt_spin_free(fd, spin);
> +	put_ahnd(ahnd);
> +	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> +	igt_power_close(&gpu);
> +
> +	/* power@max_freq should be at least 10% greater than power@min_freq */
> +	igt_assert_f((11 * min.power < 10 * max.power),
> +		     "%s:%d did not conserve power when setting lower frequency!\n",
> +		     xe_engine_class_string(hwe->engine_class), hwe->engine_instance);

What exactly are we trying to test here with this case?
This creates an artificial KPI that might not be true for the broader range
of SKUs and generations out there. And then when it fails what should we do?
come here and update the test case?

> +}
> +
>  igt_main
>  {
>  	struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> @@ -472,6 +549,17 @@ igt_main
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	igt_describe("Validate more power is consumed at higher frequencies");
> +	igt_subtest("freq-power") {
> +		/* FIXME: Remove skip once hwmon is added */
> +		igt_skip_on(xe_has_vram(fd));
> +		xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
> +			xe_for_each_hw_engine(fd, hwe) {
> +				test_freq_power(fd, gt, hwe);
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	igt_fixture {
>  		xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>  			set_freq(fd, gt, "min", stash_min);
> -- 
> 2.40.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-21 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-21  8:55 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 0/2] Add freq_power test Riana Tauro
2023-09-21  8:55 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 1/2] tests/intel/xe_guc_pc: Add freq-power test Riana Tauro
2023-09-21 12:08   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-09-21 15:58   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-09-25  9:54     ` Riana Tauro
2023-09-25 13:33       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-26  5:44         ` Riana Tauro
2023-09-21  8:55 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/2] HAX: Add freq-power to xe-fast-feedback.testlist Riana Tauro
2023-09-21 10:19 ` [igt-dev] ✗ CI.xeBAT: failure for Add freq_power test (rev2) Patchwork
2023-09-21 10:20 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-09-21 21:47 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQxoC9wD5luCg0wI@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox