Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
To: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>,
	<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 02/13] xe_ioctl: Converge bo_create to the most used version
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:11:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWYRMAcZrx4IIVe5@fdugast-desk.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231121171308.bxk6cygpivso2t7p@kamilkon-desk.igk.intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 06:13:08PM +0100, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi Francois,
> On 2023-11-16 at 14:53:37 +0000, Francois Dugast wrote:
> > From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > 
> > Let's unify the call instead of having 2 separated
> > options for the same goal.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c           | 15 ---------------
> >  lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h           |  1 -
> >  tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c   |  4 ++--
> >  tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c |  2 +-
> >  tests/intel/xe_vm.c         |  9 +++++----
> >  5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
> > index 738c4ffdb..78d431ab2 100644
> > --- a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
> > @@ -253,21 +253,6 @@ uint32_t xe_bo_create_flags(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t flags)
> >  	return handle;
> >  }
> >  
> > -uint32_t xe_bo_create(int fd, int gt, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size)
> > -{
> > -	struct drm_xe_gem_create create = {
> > -		.vm_id = vm,
> > -		.size = size,
> > -		.flags = vram_if_possible(fd, gt),
> > -	};
> > -	int err;
> > -
> > -	err = igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_GEM_CREATE, &create);
> > -	igt_assert_eq(err, 0);
> > -
> > -	return create.handle;
> > -}
> > -
> >  uint32_t xe_bind_exec_queue_create(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t ext, bool async)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance instance = {
> > diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
> > index a9171bcf7..fb191d98f 100644
> > --- a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
> > +++ b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
> > @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ void xe_vm_destroy(int fd, uint32_t vm);
> >  uint32_t __xe_bo_create_flags(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t flags,
> >  			      uint32_t *handle);
> >  uint32_t xe_bo_create_flags(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size, uint32_t flags);
> > -uint32_t xe_bo_create(int fd, int gt, uint32_t vm, uint64_t size);
> >  uint32_t xe_exec_queue_create(int fd, uint32_t vm,
> >  			  struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *instance,
> >  			  uint64_t ext);
> > diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c b/tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c
> > index e9d05cf2b..2c549f778 100644
> > --- a/tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c
> > +++ b/tests/intel/xe_perf_pmu.c
> > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void test_any_engine_busyness(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance
> >  	bo_size = ALIGN(bo_size + xe_cs_prefetch_size(fd),
> >  			xe_get_default_alignment(fd));
> >  
> > -	bo = xe_bo_create(fd, eci->gt_id, vm, bo_size);
> > +	bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0));
> ----------------------------------------------------------------- ^
> s/fd, 0/fd, eci->gt_id/
> 
> >  	spin = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, bo_size);
> >  
> >  	exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
> > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void test_engine_group_busyness(int fd, int gt, int class, const char *na
> >  	bo_size = sizeof(*data) * num_placements;
> >  	bo_size = ALIGN(bo_size + xe_cs_prefetch_size(fd), xe_get_default_alignment(fd));
> >  
> > -	bo = xe_bo_create(fd, gt, vm, bo_size);
> > +	bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0));
> ----------------------------------------------------------------- ^
> s/fd, 0/fd, gt/
> 
> >  	data = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, bo_size);
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < num_placements; i++) {
> > diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c b/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c
> > index 6ab604d9b..261fde9af 100644
> > --- a/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c
> > +++ b/tests/intel/xe_spin_batch.c
> > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void xe_spin_fixed_duration(int fd)
> >  	exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create_class(fd, vm, DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY);
> >  	ahnd = intel_allocator_open(fd, 0, INTEL_ALLOCATOR_RELOC);
> >  	bo_size = ALIGN(sizeof(*spin) + xe_cs_prefetch_size(fd), xe_get_default_alignment(fd));
> > -	bo = xe_bo_create(fd, 0, vm, bo_size);
> > +	bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0));
> >  	spin = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, bo_size);
> >  	spin_addr = intel_allocator_alloc_with_strategy(ahnd, bo, bo_size, 0,
> >  							ALLOC_STRATEGY_LOW_TO_HIGH);
> > diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_vm.c b/tests/intel/xe_vm.c
> > index 05e8e7516..eedd05b57 100644
> > --- a/tests/intel/xe_vm.c
> > +++ b/tests/intel/xe_vm.c
> > @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void test_partial_unbinds(int fd)
> >  {
> >  	uint32_t vm = xe_vm_create(fd, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_ASYNC_DEFAULT, 0);
> >  	size_t bo_size = 3 * xe_get_default_alignment(fd);
> > -	uint32_t bo = xe_bo_create(fd, 0, vm, bo_size);
> > +	uint32_t bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0));
> >  	uint64_t unbind_size = bo_size / 3;
> >  	uint64_t addr = 0x1a0000;
> >  
> > @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static void unbind_all(int fd, int n_vmas)
> >  	};
> >  
> >  	vm = xe_vm_create(fd, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_ASYNC_DEFAULT, 0);
> > -	bo = xe_bo_create(fd, 0, vm, bo_size);
> > +	bo = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0));
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < n_vmas; ++i)
> >  		xe_vm_bind_async(fd, vm, 0, bo, 0, addr + i * bo_size,
> > @@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ static void userptr_invalid(int fd)
> >  	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> >  }
> >  
> > +
> 
> Remove this newline.
> 
> Regards,
> Kamil

Sorry for the delay while finalizing the content of the kernel series. Many
thanks for the review and for catching those. It will be fixed in the next
revision.

Francois

> 
> >  /**
> >   * SUBTEST: shared-%s-page
> >   * Description: Test shared arg[1] page
> > @@ -1575,9 +1576,9 @@ test_mmap_style_bind(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> >  		igt_assert(map0 != MAP_FAILED);
> >  		igt_assert(map1 != MAP_FAILED);
> >  	} else {
> > -		bo0 = xe_bo_create(fd, eci->gt_id, vm, bo_size);
> > +		bo0 = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id));
> >  		map0 = xe_bo_map(fd, bo0, bo_size);
> > -		bo1 = xe_bo_create(fd, eci->gt_id, vm, bo_size);
> > +		bo1 = xe_bo_create_flags(fd, vm, bo_size, vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id));
> >  		map1 = xe_bo_map(fd, bo1, bo_size);
> >  	}
> >  	memset(map0, 0, bo_size);
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-28 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-16 14:53 [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 00/13] uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 01/13] drm-uapi/xe: Extend drm_xe_vm_bind_op Francois Dugast
2023-11-21 17:01   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 02/13] xe_ioctl: Converge bo_create to the most used version Francois Dugast
2023-11-21 17:13   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-11-28 16:11     ` Francois Dugast [this message]
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 03/13] xe_ioctl: Rename *xe_bo_create_flags to simply xe_bo_create Francois Dugast
2023-11-21 17:24   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 04/13] xe_query: Add missing include Francois Dugast
2023-11-21 17:00   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-11-28 17:48     ` Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 05/13] xe_query: Kill visible_vram_if_possible Francois Dugast
2023-11-21 17:40   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-11-28 19:49     ` Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 06/13] drm-uapi/xe: Separate bo_create placement from flags Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 07/13] xe: s/hw_engine/engine Francois Dugast
2023-11-21 18:15   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 08/13] drm-uapi/xe: Align with drm_xe_query_engine_info Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 09/13] drm-uapi/xe: Reject bo creation of unaligned size Francois Dugast
2023-11-17 18:44   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-11-28 20:31     ` Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 10/13] drm-uapi/xe: Align on a common way to return arrays (memory regions) Francois Dugast
2023-11-17 18:46   ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 11/13] drm-uapi/xe: Align on a common way to return arrays (gt) Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 12/13] drm-uapi/xe: Align on a common way to return arrays (engines) Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 14:53 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v1 13/13] drm-uapi/xe: Add Tile ID information to the GT info query Francois Dugast
2023-11-16 15:20 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof Patchwork
2023-11-17 18:12 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof (rev2) Patchwork
2023-11-17 19:53 ` [igt-dev] ✗ CI.xeBAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-18 14:55 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZWYRMAcZrx4IIVe5@fdugast-desk.home \
    --to=francois.dugast@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox