From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C491510EA35 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 11:48:03 -0500 From: Rodrigo Vivi To: "Dixit, Ashutosh" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] uAPI Alignment - More cleanup before upstream Message-ID: References: <20231215155050.7-1-francois.dugast@intel.com> <87sf43bgt5.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sf43bgt5.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 07:56:22AM -0800, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 07:50:40 -0800, Francois Dugast wrote: > > > > Hi Francois, > > > This is a combined submission of series which have been sent and > > reviewed separately. It aligns with this kernel series: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/127878/ > > > > Could you please set your SubjectPrefix and label your IGT patches > [PATCH i-g-t], then they will reach my correct email folder ;) I wonder why do we still need this? I understand that we needed this when igt was still using the same intel-gfx mailing list so we wanted a clear way to differentiate the igt from the kernel patches, but I don't see much sense on this after the mailng list is split. > > .git/config > > [format] > subjectPrefix = PATCH i-g-t I even had forgotten that I had this there :) > > Thanks. > -- > Ashutosh