From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/oa: Fix oa-exponents test
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 15:14:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zv8XTucpevzIEq9s@orsosgc001> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240926205120.3571276-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 01:51:20PM -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>test_oa_exponents is assuming that reports is an array of report size
>elements, whereas reports is an array of u32's. The same bug exists in both
>i915 and xe IGT's.
>
>Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2723
>Fixes: a5565306b277 ("tests/intel/xe_oa: Add oa exponent tests")
>Fixes: b3c80c93b544 ("i915/perf: Move OA format array from stack to heap")
>Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Yikes!! Thanks for finding and fixing this.
Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Umesh
>---
> tests/intel/perf.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> tests/intel/xe_oa.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tests/intel/perf.c b/tests/intel/perf.c
>index c5a103c945..a38d1b4919 100644
>--- a/tests/intel/perf.c
>+++ b/tests/intel/perf.c
>@@ -2108,6 +2108,7 @@ test_oa_exponents(const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
> #define NUM_TIMER_REPORTS 30
> uint32_t *reports = malloc(NUM_TIMER_REPORTS * format_size);
> uint32_t *timer_reports = reports;
>+ void *this, *prev;
>
> igt_debug("testing OA exponent %d,"
> " expected ts delta = %"PRIu64" (%"PRIu64"ns/%.2fus/%.2fms)\n",
>@@ -2161,21 +2162,25 @@ test_oa_exponents(const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
>
> __perf_close(stream_fd);
>
>+ this = reports + format_size / 4;
>+ prev = reports;
>+
> igt_debug("report%04i ts=%"PRIx64" hw_id=0x%08x\n", 0,
>- oa_timestamp(&reports[0], fmt),
>- oa_report_get_ctx_id(&reports[0]));
>+ oa_timestamp(prev, fmt),
>+ oa_report_get_ctx_id(prev));
> for (int i = 1; i < n_timer_reports; i++) {
>- uint64_t delta = oa_timestamp_delta(&reports[i],
>- &reports[i - 1],
>- fmt);
>+ uint64_t delta = oa_timestamp_delta(this, prev, fmt);
>
> igt_debug("report%04i ts=%"PRIx64" hw_id=0x%08x delta=%"PRIu64" %s\n", i,
>- oa_timestamp(&reports[i], fmt),
>- oa_report_get_ctx_id(&reports[i]),
>+ oa_timestamp(this, fmt),
>+ oa_report_get_ctx_id(this),
> delta, expected_report_timing_delta(delta,
> expected_timestamp_delta) ? "" : "******");
>
> matches += expected_report_timing_delta(delta,expected_timestamp_delta);
>+
>+ this += format_size;
>+ prev += format_size;
> }
>
> igt_debug("matches=%u/%u\n", matches, n_timer_reports - 1);
>diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
>index aae9be2c40..5d7a40090b 100644
>--- a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
>+++ b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
>@@ -1692,6 +1692,7 @@ static void test_oa_exponents(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> #define NUM_TIMER_REPORTS 30
> uint32_t *reports = malloc(NUM_TIMER_REPORTS * format_size);
> uint32_t *timer_reports = reports;
>+ void *this, *prev;
>
> igt_debug("testing OA exponent %d,"
> " expected ts delta = %"PRIu64" (%"PRIu64"ns/%.2fus/%.2fms)\n",
>@@ -1741,21 +1742,25 @@ static void test_oa_exponents(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
>
> __perf_close(stream_fd);
>
>+ this = reports + format_size / 4;
>+ prev = reports;
>+
> igt_debug("report%04i ts=%"PRIx64" hw_id=0x%08x\n", 0,
>- oa_timestamp(&reports[0], fmt),
>- oa_report_get_ctx_id(&reports[0]));
>+ oa_timestamp(prev, fmt),
>+ oa_report_get_ctx_id(prev));
> for (int i = 1; i < n_timer_reports; i++) {
>- uint64_t delta = oa_timestamp_delta(&reports[i],
>- &reports[i - 1],
>- fmt);
>+ uint64_t delta = oa_timestamp_delta(this, prev, fmt);
>
> igt_debug("report%04i ts=%"PRIx64" hw_id=0x%08x delta=%"PRIu64" %s\n", i,
>- oa_timestamp(&reports[i], fmt),
>- oa_report_get_ctx_id(&reports[i]),
>+ oa_timestamp(this, fmt),
>+ oa_report_get_ctx_id(this),
> delta, expected_report_timing_delta(delta,
> expected_timestamp_delta) ? "" : "******");
>
> matches += expected_report_timing_delta(delta,expected_timestamp_delta);
>+
>+ this += format_size;
>+ prev += format_size;
> }
>
> igt_debug("matches=%u/%u\n", matches, n_timer_reports - 1);
>--
>2.41.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-26 20:51 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/oa: Fix oa-exponents test Ashutosh Dixit
2024-09-26 22:48 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-09-26 22:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-27 7:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-28 1:39 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 22:14 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zv8XTucpevzIEq9s@orsosgc001 \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox