public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sharma, Nishit" <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.brost@intel.com>, <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <pravalika.gurram@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v6 6/9] tests/intel/xe_madvise: Add dontneed-before-exec subtest
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 22:18:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0303680-5405-46d4-8cd6-32c96f9e2720@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325124426.3265234-7-arvind.yadav@intel.com>


On 3/25/2026 6:14 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> This test validates GPU execution behavior when a data BO is purged
> before submission. The test creates a batch that writes to a data BO,
> purges the data BO (while keeping the batch BO valid to avoid GPU
> reset), then submits for execution. With VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE,
> the GPU write may succeed by landing on scratch memory instead of the
> purged BO, demonstrating graceful handling of purged memory during
> GPU operations.
>
> v4:
>    - Added proper resource cleanup before calling igt_skip(). (Nishit)
>
> Cc: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pravalika Gurram <pravalika.gurram@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/intel/xe_madvise.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 148 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_madvise.c b/tests/intel/xe_madvise.c
> index 9a157de1d..d126db9ed 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_madvise.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_madvise.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,11 @@ static bool xe_has_purgeable_support(int fd)
>   
>   /* Purgeable test constants */
>   #define PURGEABLE_ADDR		0x1a0000
> +#define PURGEABLE_BATCH_ADDR	0x3c0000
>   #define PURGEABLE_BO_SIZE	4096
> +#define PURGEABLE_FENCE_VAL	0xbeef
> +#define PURGEABLE_TEST_PATTERN	0xc0ffee
> +#define PURGEABLE_DEAD_PATTERN	0xdead
>   
>   /**
>    * trigger_memory_pressure - Fill VRAM/RAM + 50% to force purgeable reclaim
> @@ -206,6 +210,62 @@ static void test_purged_mmap_blocked(int fd)
>   	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * purgeable_setup_batch_and_data - Setup VM with batch and data BOs for GPU exec
> + * @fd: DRM file descriptor
> + * @vm: Output VM handle
> + * @bind_engine: Output bind engine handle
> + * @batch_bo: Output batch BO handle
> + * @data_bo: Output data BO handle
> + * @batch: Output batch buffer pointer
> + * @data: Output data buffer pointer
> + * @batch_addr: Batch virtual address
> + * @data_addr: Data virtual address
> + * @batch_size: Batch buffer size
> + * @data_size: Data buffer size
> + *
> + * Helper to create VM, bind engine, batch and data BOs, and bind them.
> + */
> +static void purgeable_setup_batch_and_data(int fd, uint32_t *vm,
> +					   uint32_t *bind_engine,
> +					   uint32_t *batch_bo,
> +					   uint32_t *data_bo,
> +					   uint32_t **batch,
> +					   uint32_t **data,
> +					   uint64_t batch_addr,
> +					   uint64_t data_addr,
> +					   size_t batch_size,
> +					   size_t data_size)
> +{
> +	struct drm_xe_sync sync = {
> +		.type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE,
> +		.flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
> +		.timeline_value = PURGEABLE_FENCE_VAL,
> +	};
> +	uint64_t vm_sync = 0;
> +
> +	*vm = xe_vm_create(fd, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE, 0);
> +	*bind_engine = xe_bind_exec_queue_create(fd, *vm, 0);
> +
> +	/* Create and bind batch BO */
> +	*batch_bo = xe_bo_create(fd, *vm, batch_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0),
> +				 DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
> +	*batch = xe_bo_map(fd, *batch_bo, batch_size);
> +
> +	sync.addr = to_user_pointer(&vm_sync);
> +	xe_vm_bind_async(fd, *vm, *bind_engine, *batch_bo, 0, batch_addr, batch_size, &sync, 1);
> +	xe_wait_ufence(fd, &vm_sync, PURGEABLE_FENCE_VAL, 0, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +
> +	/* Create and bind data BO */
> +	*data_bo = xe_bo_create(fd, *vm, data_size, vram_if_possible(fd, 0),
> +				DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
> +	*data = xe_bo_map(fd, *data_bo, data_size);
> +
> +	vm_sync = 0;
> +	xe_vm_bind_async(fd, *vm, *bind_engine, *data_bo, 0, data_addr, data_size, &sync, 1);
> +	xe_wait_ufence(fd, &vm_sync, PURGEABLE_FENCE_VAL, 0, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * SUBTEST: dontneed-before-mmap
>    * Description: Mark BO as DONTNEED before mmap, verify mmap() fails with -EBUSY
> @@ -302,6 +362,88 @@ static void test_dontneed_after_mmap(int fd)
>   	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * SUBTEST: dontneed-before-exec
> + * Description: Mark BO as DONTNEED before GPU exec, verify GPU behavior with SCRATCH_PAGE
> + * Test category: functionality test
> + */
> +static void test_dontneed_before_exec(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> +{
> +	uint32_t vm, exec_queue, bo, batch_bo, bind_engine;
> +	uint64_t data_addr = PURGEABLE_ADDR;
> +	uint64_t batch_addr = PURGEABLE_BATCH_ADDR;
> +	size_t data_size = PURGEABLE_BO_SIZE;
> +	size_t batch_size = PURGEABLE_BO_SIZE;
> +	struct drm_xe_sync sync[1] = {
> +		{ .type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE,
> +		  .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
> +		  .timeline_value = PURGEABLE_FENCE_VAL },
> +	};
> +	struct drm_xe_exec exec = {
> +		.num_batch_buffer = 1,
> +		.num_syncs = 1,
> +		.syncs = to_user_pointer(sync),
> +	};
> +	uint32_t *data, *batch;
> +	uint64_t vm_sync = 0;
> +	int b, ret;
> +
> +	purgeable_setup_batch_and_data(fd, &vm, &bind_engine, &batch_bo,
> +				       &bo, &batch, &data, batch_addr,
> +				       data_addr, batch_size, data_size);
> +
> +	/* Prepare batch */
> +	b = 0;
> +	batch[b++] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
> +	batch[b++] = data_addr;
> +	batch[b++] = data_addr >> 32;
> +	batch[b++] = PURGEABLE_DEAD_PATTERN;
> +	batch[b++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> +
> +	/* Phase 1: Purge data BO, batch BO still valid */
> +	if (!purgeable_mark_and_verify_purged(fd, vm, data_addr, data_size)) {
Same comment as in patch-4/9.
> +		munmap(data, data_size);
> +		munmap(batch, batch_size);
> +		gem_close(fd, bo);
> +		gem_close(fd, batch_bo);
> +		xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, bind_engine);
> +		xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> +		igt_skip("Unable to induce purge on this platform/config");
> +	}
> +
> +	exec_queue = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, hwe, 0);
> +	exec.exec_queue_id = exec_queue;
> +	exec.address = batch_addr;
> +
> +	vm_sync = 0;
> +	sync[0].addr = to_user_pointer(&vm_sync);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * VM has SCRATCH_PAGE — exec may succeed with the GPU write
> +	 * landing on scratch instead of the purged data BO.
> +	 */
> +	ret = __xe_exec(fd, &exec);
You can use xe_exec(fd, &exec) which is internally calling __xe_exec() 
and after use xe_wait_fence()
> +	if (ret == 0) {
> +		int64_t timeout = NSEC_PER_SEC;
> +
> +		__xe_wait_ufence(fd, &vm_sync, PURGEABLE_FENCE_VAL,
> +				 exec_queue, &timeout);
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Don't purge the batch BO — GPU would fetch zeroed scratch
> +	 * instructions and trigger an engine reset.
> +	 */
> +
> +	munmap(data, data_size);
> +	munmap(batch, batch_size);
> +	gem_close(fd, bo);
> +	gem_close(fd, batch_bo);
> +	xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, bind_engine);
> +	xe_exec_queue_destroy(fd, exec_queue);
> +	xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
> +}
> +
>   int igt_main()
>   {
>   	struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> @@ -332,6 +474,12 @@ int igt_main()
>   			break;
>   		}
>   
> +	igt_subtest("dontneed-before-exec")
> +		xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe) {
> +			test_dontneed_before_exec(fd, hwe);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
>   	igt_fixture() {
>   		xe_device_put(fd);
>   		drm_close_driver(fd);

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-06 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-25 12:44 [PATCH i-g-t v6 0/9] tests/xe: Add purgeable memory madvise tests for system allocator Arvind Yadav
2026-03-25 12:44 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 1/9] drm-uapi/xe_drm: Add UAPI support for purgeable buffer objects Arvind Yadav
2026-04-06  5:23   ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-04-06  6:00     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-03-25 12:44 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 2/9] lib/xe: Add purgeable memory ioctl support Arvind Yadav
2026-04-06  6:59   ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-04-07  3:18     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-03-25 12:44 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 3/9] tests/intel/xe_madvise: Add dontneed-before-mmap subtest Arvind Yadav
2026-04-06  9:53   ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-04-06 10:30     ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-04-07  4:21       ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-03-25 12:44 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 4/9] tests/intel/xe_madvise: Add purged-mmap-blocked subtest Arvind Yadav
2026-04-06 12:34   ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-04-07  5:09     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-03-25 12:44 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 5/9] tests/intel/xe_madvise: Add dontneed-after-mmap subtest Arvind Yadav
2026-04-06 13:33   ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-04-07  5:15     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-03-25 12:44 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 6/9] tests/intel/xe_madvise: Add dontneed-before-exec subtest Arvind Yadav
2026-04-06 16:48   ` Sharma, Nishit [this message]
2026-04-07  5:29     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-03-25 12:44 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 7/9] tests/intel/xe_madvise: Add dontneed-after-exec subtest Arvind Yadav
2026-04-07 14:51   ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-03-25 12:44 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 8/9] tests/intel/xe_madvise: Add per-vma-tracking subtest Arvind Yadav
2026-04-07  7:20   ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-04-07  8:49     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-03-25 12:44 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 9/9] tests/intel/xe_madvise: Add per-vma-protection subtest Arvind Yadav
2026-04-07  7:31   ` Sharma, Nishit
2026-04-07  8:54     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-03-25 22:59 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for tests/xe: Add purgeable memory madvise tests for system allocator (rev6) Patchwork
2026-03-25 23:15 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-26  9:19 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-26 11:22 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a0303680-5405-46d4-8cd6-32c96f9e2720@intel.com \
    --to=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
    --cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=pravalika.gurram@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox