From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Laguna, Lukasz" <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
Cc: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_ggtt: Support execution with pre-enabled VFs
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 19:32:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a844d0faa42e866dee9dbacae0af76e8087d6723.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922070940.3006983-2-lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
On Tue, 2026-09-22 at 09:09 +0200, Lukasz Laguna wrote:
> Allow the pf-check-vfs-ids subtest to run in environment where VFs
> are
> already enabled. To do that, the VFS_ENABLED=1 environment variable
> needs to be set.
>
> When VFs are pre-enabled, the pf-check-vfs-id subtest uses the
> existing
> VF, while other subtests that require test managed VF enabling are
> skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - install exit handler (Marcin),
> - s/skip_when_using_existing_vfs/require_test_managed_vfs (Marcin).
> ---
> lib/igt_sriov_device.c | 26 +++++++++++------
> tests/intel/xe_sriov_ggtt.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> --
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_sriov_device.c b/lib/igt_sriov_device.c
> index 6c9fbdf70..26b775b3c 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_sriov_device.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_sriov_device.c
> @@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ bool intel_is_vf_device(int fd)
> struct sriov_exit_handler_ctx {
> int pf;
> bool autoprobe;
> + unsigned int num_vfs;
> igt_sriov_exit_cleanup_fn cleanup_fn;
> void *cleanup_data;
> };
> @@ -572,7 +573,12 @@ static void sriov_exit_handler(int sig)
> if (sriov_exit_ctx.pf < 0)
> return;
>
> - igt_sriov_disable_vfs(sriov_exit_ctx.pf);
> + if (!sriov_exit_ctx.num_vfs) {
> + igt_sriov_disable_vfs(sriov_exit_ctx.pf);
> + } else {
> + if (igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(sriov_exit_ctx.pf) !=
> sriov_exit_ctx.num_vfs)
> + igt_warn("Test modified number of enabled
> VFs\n");
> + }
>
> if (sriov_exit_ctx.cleanup_fn)
> sriov_exit_ctx.cleanup_fn(sriov_exit_ctx.pf, sig,
> @@ -587,17 +593,17 @@ static void sriov_exit_handler(int sig)
> /**
> * igt_sriov_install_exit_handler - Install best-effort SR-IOV
> cleanup handler
> * @pf: PF device file descriptor
> - * @cleanup_fn: Optional callback invoked after VF disable
> + * @cleanup_fn: Optional callback
> * @cleanup_data: Opaque callback data
> *
> * Registers a process-exit cleanup routine for SR-IOV tests. The
> handler runs
> - * from normal and signal-triggered exits (when possible), disables
> VFs,
> - * invokes @cleanup_fn if provided (passing signal number, or 0 on
> normal
> - * exit), and restores the original autoprobe setting captured at
> - * installation time. Tests that perform full explicit teardown
> should call
> - * igt_sriov_clear_exit_handler() once that teardown succeeds. An
> internal
> - * duplicate of @pf is kept so cleanup remains usable even if the
> caller closes
> - * the original DRM fd before process exit.
> + * from normal and signal-triggered exits (when possible), disables
> VFs if no VFs
> + * were enabled at installation time, invokes @cleanup_fn if
> provided (passing
> + * signal number, or 0 on normal exit), and restores the original
> autoprobe
> + * setting captured at installation time. Tests that perform full
> explicit
> + * teardown should call igt_sriov_clear_exit_handler() once that
> teardown
> + * succeeds. An internal duplicate of @pf is kept so cleanup remains
> usable even
> + * if the caller closes the original DRM fd before process exit.
> */
> void igt_sriov_install_exit_handler(int pf,
> igt_sriov_exit_cleanup_fn
> cleanup_fn,
> @@ -616,6 +622,7 @@ void igt_sriov_install_exit_handler(int pf,
>
> sriov_exit_ctx.pf = pf_dup;
> sriov_exit_ctx.autoprobe =
> igt_sriov_is_driver_autoprobe_enabled(pf_dup);
> + sriov_exit_ctx.num_vfs = igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(pf_dup);
> sriov_exit_ctx.cleanup_fn = cleanup_fn;
> sriov_exit_ctx.cleanup_data = cleanup_data;
>
> @@ -632,6 +639,7 @@ void igt_sriov_clear_exit_handler(void)
> {
> sriov_exit_handler_release_fd();
> sriov_exit_ctx.autoprobe = false;
> + sriov_exit_ctx.num_vfs = 0;
> sriov_exit_ctx.cleanup_fn = NULL;
> sriov_exit_ctx.cleanup_data = NULL;
> }
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_sriov_ggtt.c
> b/tests/intel/xe_sriov_ggtt.c
> index bcd763eb0..d9b3ccdbb 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_sriov_ggtt.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_sriov_ggtt.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Xe tests for SR-IOV GGTT");
>
> #define SRIOV_GGTT_TC(__name) .test = __name, .name = #__name
>
> +static bool use_existing_vfs;
> +
> struct ggtt_test_data {
> int pf_fd;
> struct xe_mmio mmio;
> @@ -399,8 +401,10 @@ static void init_subtest(int pf_fd, int vf_id,
> uint8_t tile,
> uint16_t dev_id = intel_get_drm_devid(pf_fd);
> unsigned int nr_ranges, main_gt;
>
> - igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd);
> - igt_sriov_enable_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs);
> + if (!use_existing_vfs) {
> + igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd);
> + igt_sriov_enable_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs);
> + }
>
> /* refresh PCI state */
> igt_pci_system_reinit();
> @@ -437,7 +441,8 @@ static void fini_subtest(struct
> xe_sriov_provisioned_range *range,
> xe_mmio_access_fini(&test_data->pf_mmio);
> xe_mmio_access_fini(&test_data->mmio);
>
> - igt_sriov_disable_vfs(test_data->pf_fd);
> + if (!use_existing_vfs)
> + igt_sriov_disable_vfs(test_data->pf_fd);
> }
>
> #define for_each_pte_test(tc__, testcases__) \
> @@ -663,6 +668,12 @@ static void skip_on_mtl_vf(int pf_fd)
> "On MTL VF there is no access to GGTT through
> MMIO, skip\n");
> }
>
> +static void require_test_managed_vfs(void)
> +{
> + igt_skip_on_f(use_existing_vfs,
> + "This subtest cannot be run with existing
> VFs\n");
> +}
> +
> static int opts_handler(int opt, int opt_index, void *data)
> {
> switch (opt) {
> @@ -691,6 +702,7 @@ static const char help_str[] =
>
> int igt_main_args("", long_opts, help_str, opts_handler, NULL)
> {
> + unsigned int enabled_vfs;
> bool autoprobe;
> uint8_t tile;
> int pf_fd;
> @@ -699,27 +711,40 @@ int igt_main_args("", long_opts, help_str,
> opts_handler, NULL)
> {
> pf_fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
> igt_require(igt_sriov_is_pf(pf_fd));
> - igt_require(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(pf_fd) == 0);
> + use_existing_vfs =
> igt_check_boolean_env_var("VFS_ENABLED", false);
Bit of a flyby here... I don't understand why we aren't just using the
existing VFs in all cases that aren't doing explicit enable/disable
testing? If we're worried individual cases might behave differently on
a freshly enabled VF vs a pre-existing VF, why don't we just ensure CI
is randomizing the test ordering and catch via CI instead of having
completely separate executions?
Thanks,
Stuart
> + enabled_vfs = igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(pf_fd);
> + igt_require(use_existing_vfs ? enabled_vfs > 0 :
> enabled_vfs == 0);
> autoprobe =
> igt_sriov_is_driver_autoprobe_enabled(pf_fd);
> igt_sriov_install_exit_handler(pf_fd, NULL, NULL);
> }
>
> igt_describe("Verify that the VF ID in the GGTT PTE has been
> correctly assigned");
> - igt_subtest_with_dynamic("pf-check-vfs-ids")
> - for_each_sriov_num_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs)
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("pf-check-vfs-ids") {
> + if (use_existing_vfs) {
> xe_for_each_tile(pf_fd, tile)
> - igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-%u-tile-%u",
> num_vfs, tile)
> - pf_check_vfs_ids(pf_fd, tile,
> num_vfs);
> + igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-%u-tile-%u",
> enabled_vfs, tile)
> + pf_check_vfs_ids(pf_fd, tile,
> enabled_vfs);
> + } else {
> + for_each_sriov_num_vfs(pf_fd, num_vfs) {
> + xe_for_each_tile(pf_fd, tile)
> + igt_dynamic_f("numvfs-%u-
> tile-%u", num_vfs, tile)
> + pf_check_vfs_ids(pf_f
> d, tile, num_vfs);
> + }
> + }
> + }
>
> igt_describe("Verify on PF the modifiability of GGTT PTE
> assigned to VFs");
> - igt_subtest_with_dynamic("pf-check-vfs-pte")
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("pf-check-vfs-pte") {
> + require_test_managed_vfs();
> xe_for_each_tile(pf_fd, tile)
> igt_dynamic_f("tile-%u", tile)
> pf_check_vfs_pte(pf_fd, tile);
> + }
>
> igt_describe("Verify of modifiability of GGTT PTE owned by
> VF");
> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("vfs-check-own-pte") {
> skip_on_mtl_vf(pf_fd);
> + require_test_managed_vfs();
> for_each_sriov_vf(pf_fd, vf_id)
> xe_for_each_tile(pf_fd, tile)
> igt_dynamic_f("vf%u-tile-%u", vf_id,
> tile)
> @@ -730,6 +755,7 @@ int igt_main_args("", long_opts, help_str,
> opts_handler, NULL)
> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("vfs-check-other-vfs-pte") {
> igt_require(igt_sriov_get_total_vfs(pf_fd) > 1);
> skip_on_mtl_vf(pf_fd);
> + require_test_managed_vfs();
> for_each_sriov_vf(pf_fd, vf_id)
> xe_for_each_tile(pf_fd, tile)
> igt_dynamic_f("vf%u-tile-%u", vf_id,
> tile)
> @@ -739,6 +765,7 @@ int igt_main_args("", long_opts, help_str,
> opts_handler, NULL)
> igt_describe("Verify the non-availability of VF to GGTT PTEs
> owned by PF");
> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("vfs-check-pf-pte") {
> skip_on_mtl_vf(pf_fd);
> + require_test_managed_vfs();
> for_each_sriov_vf(pf_fd, vf_id)
> xe_for_each_tile(pf_fd, tile)
> igt_dynamic_f("vf%u-tile-%u", vf_id,
> tile)
> @@ -746,9 +773,14 @@ int igt_main_args("", long_opts, help_str,
> opts_handler, NULL)
> }
>
> igt_fixture() {
> - igt_sriov_disable_vfs(pf_fd);
> - /* abort to avoid execution of next tests with
> enabled VFs */
> - igt_abort_on_f(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(pf_fd) > 0,
> "Failed to disable VF(s)");
> + if (use_existing_vfs) {
> + if (igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(pf_fd) !=
> enabled_vfs)
> + igt_warn("Test modified number of
> enabled VFs\n");
> + } else {
> + igt_sriov_disable_vfs(pf_fd);
> + /* abort to avoid execution of next tests
> with enabled VFs */
> + igt_abort_on_f(igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(pf_f
> d) > 0, "Failed to disable VF(s)");
> + }
> autoprobe ? igt_sriov_enable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd)
> :
>
> igt_sriov_disable_driver_autoprobe(pf_fd);
> igt_abort_on_f(autoprobe !=
> igt_sriov_is_driver_autoprobe_enabled(pf_fd),
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 7:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] Support test execution with pre-enabled VFs Lukasz Laguna
2026-09-22 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_ggtt: Support " Lukasz Laguna
2026-09-22 19:32 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2026-09-23 7:35 ` Laguna, Lukasz
2026-09-22 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_vram: " Lukasz Laguna
2026-09-23 0:25 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Support test execution with pre-enabled VFs (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-23 0:44 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-23 13:32 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-23 15:15 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a844d0faa42e866dee9dbacae0af76e8087d6723.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
--cc=marcin.bernatowicz@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox