public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
To: <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Add basic multi queue test
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 16:21:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVW972BYDfDXJMXz@nvishwa1-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219120154.695287-3-priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 05:31:49PM +0530, priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com wrote:
>From: Priyanka Dandamudi <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>
>
>Added basic multi queue test for small buffer objects.
>
>Signed-off-by: Priyanka Dandamudi <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
>---
> tests/intel/xe_evict.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_evict.c b/tests/intel/xe_evict.c
>index 2350487c8..a62230ec6 100644
>--- a/tests/intel/xe_evict.c
>+++ b/tests/intel/xe_evict.c
>@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #define COMPUTE_THREAD		(0x1 << 4)
> #define EXTERNAL_OBJ		(0x1 << 5)
> #define BIND_EXEC_QUEUE		(0x1 << 6)
>+#define MULTI_QUEUE		(0x1 << 7)
>
> static void
> test_evict(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>@@ -80,7 +81,18 @@ test_evict(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> 		if (flags & MULTI_VM)
> 			exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, i & 1 ? vm2 : vm ,
> 						      eci, 0);
>-		else
>+		else if (flags & MULTI_QUEUE) {
>+			struct drm_xe_ext_set_property multiq = {
>+				.base.next_extension = 0,
>+				.base.name = DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_EXTENSION_SET_PROPERTY,
>+				.property = DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_MULTI_GROUP,
>+			};
>+			uint64_t ext = to_user_pointer(&multiq);
>+
>+			multiq.value = i ? exec_queues[0] : DRM_XE_MULTI_GROUP_CREATE;
>+			igt_assert_eq(__xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, 1, 1, eci,
>+							     ext, &exec_queues[i]), 0);

Do not use name 'multiq', instead use multi_queue to be consistent.

>+		} else
> 			exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
> 		syncobjs[i] = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
> 	};
>@@ -259,7 +271,18 @@ test_evict_cm(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> 		if (flags & MULTI_VM)
> 			exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, i & 1 ? vm2 :
> 							      vm, eci, 0);
>-		else
>+		else if (flags & MULTI_QUEUE) {
>+			struct drm_xe_ext_set_property multiq = {
>+				.base.next_extension = 0,
>+				.base.name = DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_EXTENSION_SET_PROPERTY,
>+				.property = DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_MULTI_GROUP,
>+			};
>+			uint64_t ext = to_user_pointer(&multiq);
>+
>+			multiq.value = i ? exec_queues[0] : DRM_XE_MULTI_GROUP_CREATE;
>+			igt_assert_eq(__xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, 1, 1, eci,
>+							     ext, &exec_queues[i]), 0);

Same here.

>+		} else
> 			exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
> 	}
>
>@@ -516,6 +539,7 @@ static unsigned int working_set(uint64_t vram_size, uint64_t system_size,
>  * arg[1]:
>  *
>  * @small:			small
>+ * @small-multiqueue:		small multi queue

Same here and below. Use multi-queue to be consistent
instead of multiqueue.

>  * @small-external:		small external
>  * @small-multi-vm:		small multi VM
>  * @beng-small:			small bind exec_queue
>@@ -546,6 +570,7 @@ static unsigned int working_set(uint64_t vram_size, uint64_t system_size,
>  * arg[1]:
>  *
>  * @small-cm:			small compute machine
>+ * @small-multiqueue-cm:	small multi queue compute machine
>  * @small-external-cm:		small external compute machine
>  * @small-multi-vm-cm:		small multi VM compute machine
>  * @beng-small-cm:		small bind exec_queue compute machine
>@@ -678,7 +703,7 @@ static unsigned int working_set(uint64_t vram_size, uint64_t system_size,
>  */
> int igt_main()
> {
>-	struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
>+	struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe, *multi_queue_hwe = NULL;
> 	const struct section {
> 		const char *name;
> 		int n_exec_queues;
>@@ -688,6 +713,7 @@ int igt_main()
> 		unsigned int flags;
> 	} sections[] = {
> 		{ "small", 16, 448, 1, 128, 0 },
>+		{ "small-multiqueue", 16, 448, 1, 128, MULTI_QUEUE },
> 		{ "small-external", 16, 448, 1, 128, EXTERNAL_OBJ },
> 		{ "small-multi-vm", 16, 256, 1, 128, MULTI_VM },
> 		{ "large", 4, 16, 1, 4, 0 },
>@@ -713,6 +739,7 @@ int igt_main()
> 		unsigned int flags;
> 	} sections_cm[] = {
> 		{ "small-cm", 16, 448, 1, 128, 0 },
>+		{ "small-multiqueue-cm", 16, 448, 1, 128, MULTI_QUEUE },
> 		{ "small-external-cm", 16, 448, 1, 128, EXTERNAL_OBJ },
> 		{ "small-multi-vm-cm", 16, 256, 1, 128, MULTI_VM },
> 		{ "large-cm", 4, 16, 1, 4, 0 },
>@@ -820,6 +847,9 @@ int igt_main()
> 		xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe)
> 			if (hwe->engine_class != DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY)
> 				break;
>+
>+		xe_for_each_multi_queue_engine(fd, multi_queue_hwe)
>+			break;
> 	}
>
> 	for (const struct section *s = sections; s->name; s++) {
>@@ -829,9 +859,13 @@ int igt_main()
> 					     1, s->flags);
>
> 			igt_debug("Max working set %d n_execs %d\n", ws, s->n_execs);
>+			if (s->flags & MULTI_QUEUE) {
>+				igt_require(intel_graphics_ver(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)) >= IP_VER(35, 0));
>+				igt_require(multi_queue_hwe != NULL);
>+			}

May be also assert that s->flags do not have MULTI_VM flag set.
Same applies to below sections as well.

Niranjana

> 			igt_skip_on_f(!ws, "System memory size is too small.\n");
>-			test_evict(fd, hwe, s->n_exec_queues,
>-				   min(ws, s->n_execs), bo_size,
>+			test_evict(fd, s->flags & MULTI_QUEUE ? multi_queue_hwe : hwe,
>+				   s->n_exec_queues, min(ws, s->n_execs), bo_size,
> 				   s->flags, NULL);
> 		}
> 	}
>@@ -843,10 +877,13 @@ int igt_main()
> 					     1, s->flags);
>
> 			igt_debug("Max working set %d n_execs %d\n", ws, s->n_execs);
>+			if (s->flags & MULTI_QUEUE) {
>+				igt_require(intel_graphics_ver(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)) >= IP_VER(35, 0));
>+				igt_require(multi_queue_hwe != NULL);
>+			}
> 			igt_skip_on_f(!ws, "System memory size is too small.\n");
>-			test_evict_cm(fd, hwe, s->n_exec_queues,
>-				      min(ws, s->n_execs), bo_size,
>-				      s->flags, NULL);
>+			test_evict_cm(fd, s->flags & MULTI_QUEUE ? multi_queue_hwe : hwe, s->n_exec_queues,
>+				      min(ws, s->n_execs), bo_size, s->flags, NULL);
> 		}
> 	}
>
>@@ -857,9 +894,14 @@ int igt_main()
> 					     s->n_threads, s->flags);
>
> 			igt_debug("Max working set %d n_execs %d\n", ws, s->n_execs);
>+			if (s->flags & MULTI_QUEUE) {
>+				igt_require(intel_graphics_ver(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)) >= IP_VER(35, 0));
>+				igt_require(multi_queue_hwe != NULL);
>+			}
> 			igt_skip_on_f(!ws, "System memory size is too small.\n");
>-			threads(fd, hwe, s->n_threads, s->n_exec_queues,
>-				min(ws, s->n_execs), bo_size, s->flags);
>+			threads(fd, s->flags & MULTI_QUEUE ? multi_queue_hwe : hwe,
>+				s->n_threads, s->n_exec_queues, min(ws, s->n_execs),
>+				bo_size, s->flags);
> 		}
> 	}
>
>-- 
>2.43.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-01  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-19 12:01 [PATCH i-g-t 0/7] Extend multi queue feature validation support priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_fault_mode: Add multi queue test support priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-31 19:55   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-07  6:24     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Add basic multi queue test priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01  0:21   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura [this message]
2026-01-07  6:25     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-01-01  0:34   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Add priority for multi queue priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01  0:23   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:29     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Enhance testing of multi queue functionality priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01  0:27   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:32     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 5/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add multi queue subtests priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01  4:17   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:39     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 6/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_threads: Add multi queue basic test priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-31 21:15   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-01  4:19     ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:33       ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-01-14  6:28     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 7/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_threads: Extend multi queue testing priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-31 21:34   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:36     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-22 21:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Extend multi queue feature validation support (rev2) Patchwork
2025-12-22 22:11 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-23  4:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-12-24  6:06 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aVW972BYDfDXJMXz@nvishwa1-desk \
    --to=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox