public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
To: <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 6/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_threads: Add multi queue basic test
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 13:15:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVWShAsoxGrXXtom@nvishwa1-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219120154.695287-7-priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 05:31:53PM +0530, priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com wrote:
>From: Janga Rahul Kumar <janga.rahul.kumar@intel.com>
>
>Check multi queue functionality in parallel execution scenario.
>Changed naming for multi queue and assign exec_queue create
>
>Signed-off-by: Janga Rahul Kumar <janga.rahul.kumar@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Priyanka Dandamudi <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>

Same here, remove email ids that are no longer valid.

>---
> tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c
>index e8d56a3ef..4bf1cd1b1 100644
>--- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c
>+++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c
>@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> #define REBIND_ERROR	(0x1 << 12)
> #define BIND_EXEC_QUEUE	(0x1 << 13)
> #define MANY_QUEUES	(0x1 << 14)
>+#define MULTI_QUEUE		(0x1 << 15)
>
> pthread_barrier_t barrier;
>
>@@ -540,8 +541,22 @@ test_legacy_mode(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t addr, uint64_t userptr,
>
> 	memset(sync_all, 0, sizeof(sync_all));
> 	for (i = 0; i < n_exec_queues; i++) {
>-		if (!(flags & MANY_QUEUES))
>-			exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
>+		if (flags & MULTI_QUEUE) {
>+			struct drm_xe_ext_set_property multi_queue = {
>+				.base.next_extension = 0,
>+				.base.name = DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_EXTENSION_SET_PROPERTY,
>+				.property = DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_MULTI_GROUP,
>+			};
>+
>+			uint64_t ext = to_user_pointer(&multi_queue);
>+
>+			multi_queue.value = i ? exec_queues[0] : DRM_XE_MULTI_GROUP_CREATE;
>+			exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, ext);
>+		} else {
>+			if (!(flags & MANY_QUEUES))
>+				exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
>+		}
>+
> 		if (flags & BIND_EXEC_QUEUE)
> 			bind_exec_queues[i] = xe_bind_exec_queue_create(fd, vm,
> 									0);
>@@ -979,6 +994,8 @@ static void *thread(void *data)
>  *	balancer mixed fd userptr invalidate
>  * @bal-mixed-fd-userptr-invalidate-race:
>  *	balancer mixed fd userptr invalidate race
>+ * @multi-queue-shared-vm-basic:
>+ *	multi-queue shared vm basic test

I don't see MultiQ mega feature being added here as done in patch #1.
Looks like it is not consistently added. It probably makes sense to
remove it from individual patches and add a separate patch for all
the multi-queue tests.

Niranjana

>  */
>
> static void threads(int fd, int flags)
>@@ -996,8 +1013,11 @@ static void threads(int fd, int flags)
> 	int n_threads = 0;
> 	int gt;
>
>-	xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe)
>+	xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe) {
>+		if ((flags & MULTI_QUEUE) && !xe_engine_class_supports_multi_queue(hwe->engine_class))
>+			continue;
> 		++n_engines;
>+	}
>
> 	if (flags & BALANCER) {
> 		xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
>@@ -1023,6 +1043,8 @@ static void threads(int fd, int flags)
> 	}
>
> 	xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe) {
>+		if ((flags & MULTI_QUEUE) && !xe_engine_class_supports_multi_queue(hwe->engine_class))
>+			continue;
> 		threads_data[i].mutex = &mutex;
> 		threads_data[i].cond = &cond;
> #define ADDRESS_SHIFT	39
>@@ -1277,6 +1299,7 @@ int igt_main()
> 			FD | USERPTR | INVALIDATE },
> 		{ "bal-mixed-fd-userptr-invalidate-race", BALANCER |
> 			MIXED_MODE | FD | USERPTR | INVALIDATE | RACE },
>+		{ "multi-queue-shared-vm-basic", MULTI_QUEUE | SHARED_VM },

What about other tests? Why not add multi-queue variants of those?

Niranjana

> 		{ NULL },
> 	};
> 	int fd;
>@@ -1285,8 +1308,16 @@ int igt_main()
> 		fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
>
> 	for (const struct section *s = sections; s->name; s++) {
>-		igt_subtest_f("threads-%s", s->name)
>+		igt_subtest_f("threads-%s", s->name) {
>+			if (s->flags & MULTI_QUEUE) {
>+				igt_skip_on_f(!(intel_graphics_ver(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)) >= IP_VER(35, 0)),
>+						"multi_queue is supported on graphics version 35 and above");
>+				/* Balancer can't be set with multi-queue at the same time */
>+				igt_assert(!(s->flags & BALANCER));
>+			}
>+
> 			threads(fd, s->flags);
>+		}
> 	}
>
> 	igt_fixture()
>-- 
>2.43.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-31 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-19 12:01 [PATCH i-g-t 0/7] Extend multi queue feature validation support priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_fault_mode: Add multi queue test support priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-31 19:55   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-07  6:24     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Add basic multi queue test priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01  0:21   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-07  6:25     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-01-01  0:34   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Add priority for multi queue priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01  0:23   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:29     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Enhance testing of multi queue functionality priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01  0:27   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:32     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 5/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add multi queue subtests priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01  4:17   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:39     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 6/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_threads: Add multi queue basic test priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-31 21:15   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura [this message]
2026-01-01  4:19     ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:33       ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-01-14  6:28     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 7/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_threads: Extend multi queue testing priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-31 21:34   ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14  6:36     ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-22 21:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Extend multi queue feature validation support (rev2) Patchwork
2025-12-22 22:11 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-23  4:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-12-24  6:06 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aVWShAsoxGrXXtom@nvishwa1-desk \
    --to=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox