From: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
To: <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 6/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_threads: Add multi queue basic test
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 13:15:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVWShAsoxGrXXtom@nvishwa1-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219120154.695287-7-priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 05:31:53PM +0530, priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com wrote:
>From: Janga Rahul Kumar <janga.rahul.kumar@intel.com>
>
>Check multi queue functionality in parallel execution scenario.
>Changed naming for multi queue and assign exec_queue create
>
>Signed-off-by: Janga Rahul Kumar <janga.rahul.kumar@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Priyanka Dandamudi <priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com>
Same here, remove email ids that are no longer valid.
>---
> tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c
>index e8d56a3ef..4bf1cd1b1 100644
>--- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c
>+++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_threads.c
>@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> #define REBIND_ERROR (0x1 << 12)
> #define BIND_EXEC_QUEUE (0x1 << 13)
> #define MANY_QUEUES (0x1 << 14)
>+#define MULTI_QUEUE (0x1 << 15)
>
> pthread_barrier_t barrier;
>
>@@ -540,8 +541,22 @@ test_legacy_mode(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t addr, uint64_t userptr,
>
> memset(sync_all, 0, sizeof(sync_all));
> for (i = 0; i < n_exec_queues; i++) {
>- if (!(flags & MANY_QUEUES))
>- exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
>+ if (flags & MULTI_QUEUE) {
>+ struct drm_xe_ext_set_property multi_queue = {
>+ .base.next_extension = 0,
>+ .base.name = DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_EXTENSION_SET_PROPERTY,
>+ .property = DRM_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_MULTI_GROUP,
>+ };
>+
>+ uint64_t ext = to_user_pointer(&multi_queue);
>+
>+ multi_queue.value = i ? exec_queues[0] : DRM_XE_MULTI_GROUP_CREATE;
>+ exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, ext);
>+ } else {
>+ if (!(flags & MANY_QUEUES))
>+ exec_queues[i] = xe_exec_queue_create(fd, vm, eci, 0);
>+ }
>+
> if (flags & BIND_EXEC_QUEUE)
> bind_exec_queues[i] = xe_bind_exec_queue_create(fd, vm,
> 0);
>@@ -979,6 +994,8 @@ static void *thread(void *data)
> * balancer mixed fd userptr invalidate
> * @bal-mixed-fd-userptr-invalidate-race:
> * balancer mixed fd userptr invalidate race
>+ * @multi-queue-shared-vm-basic:
>+ * multi-queue shared vm basic test
I don't see MultiQ mega feature being added here as done in patch #1.
Looks like it is not consistently added. It probably makes sense to
remove it from individual patches and add a separate patch for all
the multi-queue tests.
Niranjana
> */
>
> static void threads(int fd, int flags)
>@@ -996,8 +1013,11 @@ static void threads(int fd, int flags)
> int n_threads = 0;
> int gt;
>
>- xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe)
>+ xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe) {
>+ if ((flags & MULTI_QUEUE) && !xe_engine_class_supports_multi_queue(hwe->engine_class))
>+ continue;
> ++n_engines;
>+ }
>
> if (flags & BALANCER) {
> xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
>@@ -1023,6 +1043,8 @@ static void threads(int fd, int flags)
> }
>
> xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe) {
>+ if ((flags & MULTI_QUEUE) && !xe_engine_class_supports_multi_queue(hwe->engine_class))
>+ continue;
> threads_data[i].mutex = &mutex;
> threads_data[i].cond = &cond;
> #define ADDRESS_SHIFT 39
>@@ -1277,6 +1299,7 @@ int igt_main()
> FD | USERPTR | INVALIDATE },
> { "bal-mixed-fd-userptr-invalidate-race", BALANCER |
> MIXED_MODE | FD | USERPTR | INVALIDATE | RACE },
>+ { "multi-queue-shared-vm-basic", MULTI_QUEUE | SHARED_VM },
What about other tests? Why not add multi-queue variants of those?
Niranjana
> { NULL },
> };
> int fd;
>@@ -1285,8 +1308,16 @@ int igt_main()
> fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
>
> for (const struct section *s = sections; s->name; s++) {
>- igt_subtest_f("threads-%s", s->name)
>+ igt_subtest_f("threads-%s", s->name) {
>+ if (s->flags & MULTI_QUEUE) {
>+ igt_skip_on_f(!(intel_graphics_ver(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)) >= IP_VER(35, 0)),
>+ "multi_queue is supported on graphics version 35 and above");
>+ /* Balancer can't be set with multi-queue at the same time */
>+ igt_assert(!(s->flags & BALANCER));
>+ }
>+
> threads(fd, s->flags);
>+ }
> }
>
> igt_fixture()
>--
>2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-31 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 12:01 [PATCH i-g-t 0/7] Extend multi queue feature validation support priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_fault_mode: Add multi queue test support priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-31 19:55 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-07 6:24 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Add basic multi queue test priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01 0:21 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-07 6:25 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-01-01 0:34 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Add priority for multi queue priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01 0:23 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14 6:29 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/7] tests/intel/xe_evict: Enhance testing of multi queue functionality priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01 0:27 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14 6:32 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 5/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add multi queue subtests priyanka.dandamudi
2026-01-01 4:17 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14 6:39 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 6/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_threads: Add multi queue basic test priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-31 21:15 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura [this message]
2026-01-01 4:19 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14 6:33 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2026-01-14 6:28 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 7/7] tests/intel/xe_exec_threads: Extend multi queue testing priyanka.dandamudi
2025-12-31 21:34 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-01-14 6:36 ` Dandamudi, Priyanka
2025-12-22 21:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Extend multi queue feature validation support (rev2) Patchwork
2025-12-22 22:11 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-23 4:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-12-24 6:06 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aVWShAsoxGrXXtom@nvishwa1-desk \
--to=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=priyanka.dandamudi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox