From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Pranay Samala <pranay.samala@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, karthik.b.s@intel.com,
sameer.lattannavar@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/kms_big_fb: Skip 90/270 rotation on Display Ver >= 13
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:09:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaFDIopUYrpOWgXl@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260227063333.2044616-1-pranay.samala@intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 12:03:33PM +0530, Pranay Samala wrote:
> >From Display Ver 13, 90/270 hardware rotation no longer
> supported. Skip these tests on affected platforms. Also move
> plane capability checks to the outer loop to continue testing
> other planes.
That's two different things -> should be two patches
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranay Samala <pranay.samala@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/kms_big_fb.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_big_fb.c b/tests/intel/kms_big_fb.c
> index 66d7c5428..171b38602 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/kms_big_fb.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_big_fb.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ typedef struct {
> int hw_stride;
> int max_hw_fb_width;
> double planeclearrgb[3];
> + int disp_ver;
> } data_t;
>
> static struct intel_buf *init_buf(data_t *data,
> @@ -422,12 +423,6 @@ static bool test_plane(data_t *data)
> { w, h, },
> };
>
> - if (!igt_plane_has_format_mod(plane, data->format, data->modifier))
> - return false;
> -
> - if (!igt_plane_has_rotation(plane, data->rotation))
> - return false;
> -
> if (igt_plane_has_prop(plane, IGT_PLANE_ROTATION))
> igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, data->rotation);
> igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> @@ -570,6 +565,10 @@ static bool test_pipe(data_t *data)
> IGT_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_AUTO);
>
> for_each_plane_on_pipe(&data->display, data->crtc->pipe, data->plane) {
> + if (!igt_plane_has_rotation(data->plane, data->rotation))
> + continue;
> + if (!igt_plane_has_format_mod(data->plane, data->format, data->modifier))
> + continue;
> ret = test_plane(data);
> if (ret || run_in_simulation)
That whole run_in_simulation nonsense seems to be the reason why
you need to change something here. Just remove the nonsense and
this should work fine.
> break;
> @@ -688,6 +687,9 @@ static void test_scanout(data_t *data)
> igt_crtc_t *crtc;
> igt_output_t *output;
>
> + if (igt_rotation_90_or_270(data->rotation))
> + igt_require_f(data->disp_ver < 13, "90/270 rotation not supported by platform\n");
Please don't add yet more platform checks when the test already has
the hardware agnostic logic to skip everything when the thing isn't
supported.
> +
> igt_require(data->format == DRM_FORMAT_C8 ||
> igt_fb_supported_format(data->format));
>
> @@ -983,6 +985,7 @@ int igt_main()
> igt_require(is_intel_device(data.drm_fd));
>
> data.devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd);
> + data.disp_ver = intel_display_ver(data.devid);
>
> kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
>
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 6:33 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/kms_big_fb: Skip 90/270 rotation on Display Ver >= 13 Pranay Samala
2026-02-27 7:09 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2026-02-27 13:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaFDIopUYrpOWgXl@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karthik.b.s@intel.com \
--cc=pranay.samala@intel.com \
--cc=sameer.lattannavar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox