From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1208810E10A for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 05:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 10:58:44 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: "Hogander, Jouni" , "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" References: <20230112073537.27890-1-swati2.sharma@intel.com> <20230112073537.27890-4-swati2.sharma@intel.com> From: Swati Sharma In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 3/8] lib/dsc: Add helpers for VDSC YCbCr420 debugfs entry List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: On 20-Jan-23 4:32 PM, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 22:06 +0530, Swati Sharma wrote: >> >> >> On 13-Jan-23 1:47 PM, Hogander, Jouni wrote: >>>> + * Returns: 1 on success or negative error code, in case of >>>> failure. >>> 0 is usually success, < 0 is error. This is also in coding style >>> document. I see igt_force_dsc_enable is also using 1. Maybe you >>> should >>> fix that as well in a separate patch. >>> >> This ret value is returned from igt_sysfs_write() which returns the >> number of bytes written, or -errno on error. >> >> I guess we can't change this. >> > > No, igt_sysfs_write is logical. It returns bytes written or < 0 on > error. What you could do is to check ret value of igt_sysfs_write and > return 0 if igt_sysfs_write succeeded. ohh, okay got it. Will make those changes. Thanks! > > BR, > > Jouni Högander > -- ~Swati Sharma