From: "Hellstrom, Thomas" <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
To: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Sharma, Nishit" <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe: Introduce aligned buffer mapping
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 18:53:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeee76de85ea852c8ab6f8e886a0046fb3bb6dec.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311170354.475828-2-nishit.sharma@intel.com>
On Wed, 2026-03-11 at 17:03 +0000, nishit.sharma@intel.com wrote:
> From: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
>
> Added aligned buffer mapping which is providing an interface for
> mapping
> buffer objects with a specified alignment. This API improves
> cross-platform compatibility and simplifies batch buffer setup by
> eliminating the need for platform-specific address handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
> index 16aae05c9..2e9e75656 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.c
> @@ -579,6 +579,46 @@ void *xe_bo_map_fixed(int fd, uint32_t bo,
> size_t size, uint64_t addr)
> return map;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * xe_bo_map_aligned() - Create a bo CPU map requiring an alignment
> for the
> + * returned address.
> + * @fd: The device file-descriptor
> + * @bo: The buffer object
> + * @size: The size of the map
> + * @alignment: The requested map alingment.
s/alingment/alignment/
Return:
> + */
> +void *xe_bo_map_aligned(int fd, uint32_t bo, size_t size, size_t
> alignment)
> +{
> + size_t anon_size = size + alignment;
> + uint64_t anon_addr;
> + void *anon_map, *map;
> + uint64_t map_addr;
> + size_t hole_size;
> +
> +
> + /* Reserve a range of virtual space where we can fit an
> aligned map */
> + anon_map = mmap(NULL, anon_size, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE |
> MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> + igt_assert(anon_map != MAP_FAILED);
> + anon_addr = to_user_pointer(anon_map);
> +
> + /* Compute the first aligned address within the virtual
> space. */
> + map_addr = ALIGN(anon_addr, alignment);
> + /* Map the bo there, replacing part of the reserved virtual
> range. */
> + map = xe_bo_map_fixed(fd, bo, size, map_addr);
Perhaps an igt_assert() that map is indeed properly aligned.
> +
> + /* Unreserve part of the virtual range (if any) *before* the
> bo map */
> + hole_size = map_addr - anon_addr;
> + if (hole_size)
> + igt_assert(munmap(anon_map, hole_size) == 0);
> +
> + /* Unreserve part of the virtual range (if any) *after* the
> bo map */
> + hole_size = anon_size - hole_size - size;
> + if (hole_size)
> + igt_assert(munmap(map + size, hole_size) == 0);
> +
> + return map;
> +}
> +
> void *xe_bo_mmap_ext(int fd, uint32_t bo, size_t size, int prot)
> {
> return __xe_bo_map(fd, bo, size, prot);
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
> index 3ea651063..b62d259fd 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_ioctl.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ void xe_exec_queue_destroy(int fd, uint32_t
> exec_queue);
> uint64_t xe_bo_mmap_offset(int fd, uint32_t bo);
> void *xe_bo_map(int fd, uint32_t bo, size_t size);
> void *xe_bo_map_fixed(int fd, uint32_t bo, size_t size, uint64_t
> addr);
> +void *xe_bo_map_aligned(int fd, uint32_t bo, size_t size, size_t
> alignment);
> void *xe_bo_mmap_ext(int fd, uint32_t bo, size_t size, int prot);
> int __xe_exec(int fd, struct drm_xe_exec *exec);
> void xe_exec(int fd, struct drm_xe_exec *exec);
Otherwise need an additional reviewer, since I contributed to the
patch.
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 17:03 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Unify Batch Buffer Alignment and Introduce Aligned Buffer Mapping nishit.sharma
2026-03-11 17:03 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe: Introduce aligned buffer mapping nishit.sharma
2026-03-11 18:53 ` Hellstrom, Thomas [this message]
2026-03-11 17:03 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_svm_usrptr_madvise: Unify batch buffer alignment nishit.sharma
2026-03-11 18:54 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2026-03-12 1:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Unify Batch Buffer Alignment and Introduce Aligned Buffer Mapping Patchwork
2026-03-12 1:48 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-12 21:03 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-12 21:45 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeee76de85ea852c8ab6f8e886a0046fb3bb6dec.camel@intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox