From: "Modem, Bhanuprakash" <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
To: <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe.
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 12:41:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af77b5fa-5991-2790-9b56-c58e03ef261d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230522123605.17416-3-sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
On Mon-22-05-2023 06:06 pm, sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com wrote:
> From: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
>
> xe_spin_batch test exercises basic igt_spin_new submissions and
> and with all engines.
>
> Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Gowtham Ch <sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/meson.build | 1 +
> tests/xe/xe_spin_batch.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/xe/xe_spin_batch.c
>
> diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
> index f71be1db..e794b75a 100644
> --- a/tests/meson.build
> +++ b/tests/meson.build
> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ xe_progs = [
> 'xe_query',
> 'xe_vm',
> 'xe_waitfence',
> + 'xe_spin_batch',
> ]
>
> msm_progs = [
> diff --git a/tests/xe/xe_spin_batch.c b/tests/xe/xe_spin_batch.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..55fbca92
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xe/xe_spin_batch.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
> +#include "igt.h"
> +#include "lib/intel_reg.h"
> +#include "xe_drm.h"
> +#include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
> +#include "xe/xe_query.h"
> +
> +#define MAX_INSTANCE 9
> +/**
> + * TEST: Basic test for spin batch submission.
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: spin-batch
> + * Description: Simple test!
> + * Run type: FULL
> + * TODO: change ``'Run type' == FULL`` to a better category
> + *
> + */
> +
> +static void spin(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> +{
> + uint64_t ahnd;
> + unsigned int engine;
> + uint32_t vm;
> + igt_spin_t *spin;
> +
> + vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
> + engine = xe_engine_create(fd, vm, hwe, 0);
> + ahnd = intel_allocator_open(fd, 0, INTEL_ALLOCATOR_RELOC);
> +
> + spin = __igt_spin_new(fd, .ahnd = ahnd, .hwe = hwe, .engine = engine, .vm = vm);
> + igt_assert(spin);
> +
> + igt_spin_free(fd, spin);
> + put_ahnd(ahnd);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * TEST: Test for spin batch submissions.
> + * SUBTEST: spin-all
> + * Description: Spinner test to run on all the engines!
> + * Run type: FULL
> + * TODO: change ``'Run type' == FULL`` to a better category
> + *
> + */
> +
> +static void spin_all (int fd, int gt, int class)
> +{
> + uint64_t ahnd;
> + uint32_t engines[MAX_INSTANCE];
> + uint32_t vm[MAX_INSTANCE];
> + int i, num_placements = 0;
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance eci[MAX_INSTANCE];
> + igt_spin_t *spin[MAX_INSTANCE];
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> +
> + ahnd = intel_allocator_open(fd, 0, INTEL_ALLOCATOR_RELOC);
> +
> + xe_for_each_hw_engine(fd, hwe) {
> + if (hwe->engine_class != class || hwe->gt_id != gt)
> + continue;
> + eci[num_placements++] = *hwe;
> + }
> + if (num_placements < 2)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_placements; i++) {
> + struct drm_xe_engine_create create;
> + vm[i] = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
> +
> + create.vm_id = vm[i];
> + create.width = 1;
> + create.num_placements = num_placements;
> + create.instances = to_user_pointer(eci);
> +
> + igt_assert_eq(igt_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_ENGINE_CREATE,
> + &create), 0);
> + engines[i] = create.engine_id;
> + spin[i] = __igt_spin_new(fd, .ahnd = ahnd, .hwe = eci, .engine = engines[i], .vm = vm[i]);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_placements; i++) {
> + igt_assert(spin[i]);
> + igt_spin_free(fd, spin[i]);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +igt_main
> +{
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> + int fd;
> + int gt, class;
> +
> + igt_fixture {
> + fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
> + xe_device_get(fd);
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest("spin-batch")
> + xe_for_each_hw_engine(fd, hwe)
I think, this loop should be handled inside the xe spin helper (like
spin_create()). Since KMS also trying to use the same helper & really
don't care about hardware engines.
- Bhanu
> + spin(fd, hwe);
> +
> + igt_subtest("spin-all") {
> + xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
> + xe_for_each_hw_engine_class(class)
> + spin_all(fd, gt, class);
> + }
> +
> + igt_fixture {
> + xe_device_put(fd);
> + close(fd);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-22 12:36 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-05-22 12:36 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe/xe_spin: " sai.gowtham.ch
2023-05-22 16:19 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-05-23 8:41 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2023-05-23 11:29 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-05-23 15:58 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-05-22 12:36 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-05-24 7:11 ` Modem, Bhanuprakash [this message]
2023-05-24 19:47 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2023-05-25 5:46 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-05-22 13:45 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe Patchwork
2023-05-22 19:28 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-25 5:55 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] " sai.gowtham.ch
2023-05-25 5:55 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-05-29 5:57 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-05-29 11:02 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2023-05-30 19:12 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-05-30 10:08 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-05-30 10:08 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-05-31 5:55 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-06-04 19:16 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-04 19:16 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-04 19:58 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-04 19:58 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-05 8:59 ` Kumar, Janga Rahul
2023-06-05 10:44 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-06-05 13:24 ` Ch, Sai Gowtham
2023-06-05 18:00 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-06-06 8:50 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-06 8:50 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-06 20:00 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-06-12 8:59 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-12 8:59 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-12 18:46 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-06-13 12:42 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-13 12:42 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-14 17:43 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2023-06-15 10:59 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Integrate igt_spin_new with Xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-15 10:59 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/xe/xe_spin_batch: Add new test to exercise igt_spin_new for xe sai.gowtham.ch
2023-06-16 6:22 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af77b5fa-5991-2790-9b56-c58e03ef261d@intel.com \
--to=bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sai.gowtham.ch@intel.com \
--cc=zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox