From: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
To: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add multi-queue long spin tests
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 13:11:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afzyB8qbkY8_1yNi@nvishwa1-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <130b948c986be91a0bf7be181d213fcd74245a51.camel@intel.com>
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 12:37:23PM -0700, Summers, Stuart wrote:
>On Wed, 2026-05-06 at 11:31 -0700, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>> From: gta <gta@DUT4637NVLP.fm.intel.com>
>>
>> Add the following multi-queue tests and update xe_legacy_test_mode()
>> function to use queue_timestamp and multi_queue_switch spinner
>> options
>> for the multi-queue scenarios.
>>
>> multi-queue-long-spin-many-preempt
>> multi-queue-long-spin-reuse-many-preempt
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura
>> <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
>> ---
>> lib/xe/xe_legacy.c | 2 ++
>> tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_legacy.c b/lib/xe/xe_legacy.c
>> index f9bd5bcb61..b7054756cd 100644
>> --- a/lib/xe/xe_legacy.c
>> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_legacy.c
>> @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ xe_legacy_test_mode(int fd, struct
>> drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>> } *data;
>> struct xe_spin_opts spin_opts = {
>> .preempt = flags & PREEMPT,
>> + .multi_queue_switch = flags & MULTI_QUEUE,
>> + .use_queue_timestamp = flags & MULTI_QUEUE,
>> #define THREE_SEC (3 * 1000000000ull)
>> .ctx_ticks = flags & LONG_SPIN ?
>> xe_spin_nsec_to_ticks(fd, 0, THREE_SEC) : 0,
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>> b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>> index a3cf290abf..f7ae94a424 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>> @@ -1179,6 +1179,23 @@ int igt_main()
>> MULTI_QUEUE);
>> }
>>
>> + igt_subtest("multi-queue-long-spin-many-preempt")
>
>These need to be documented now. The existing non-multi queue tests
>talk about preemption being the deciding factor in ensuring we aren't
>getting engine resets. So here would be nice to call out lite restore
>explicitly.
>
>Other than documentation the changes look good.
>
Sure, will add.
Niranjana
>Thanks,
>Stuart
>
>> + xe_for_each_multi_queue_engine(fd, hwe) {
>> + xe_legacy_test_mode(fd, hwe, 4, 8,
>> + LONG_SPIN | MULTI_QUEUE,
>> + LEGACY_MODE_ADDR, false);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + igt_subtest("multi-queue-long-spin-reuse-many-preempt")
>> + xe_for_each_multi_queue_engine(fd, hwe) {
>> + xe_legacy_test_mode(fd, hwe, 4, 8,
>> + LONG_SPIN | MULTI_QUEUE |
>> + LONG_SPIN_REUSE_QUEUE,
>> + LEGACY_MODE_ADDR, false);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> igt_fixture()
>> drm_close_driver(fd);
>> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 18:31 [PATCH 0/3] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Validate multi-queue timestamping Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-06 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] lib/xe/xe_spin: Enhance multi-queue switch option Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-07 0:50 ` Wang, X
2026-05-07 19:15 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-07 20:11 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-06 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] lib/xe/xe_spin: Add option for QUEUE_TIMESTAMP Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-07 19:23 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-07 19:41 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-05-07 20:05 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-07 20:07 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-06 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add multi-queue long spin tests Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-05-07 19:37 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-05-07 20:11 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afzyB8qbkY8_1yNi@nvishwa1-desk \
--to=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox