Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
To: I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets without full-ppgtt (rev2)
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:13:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b686f1e04539972035a956484ba2d1c64c826ffd.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179098253053.235005.17621157884243839447@61270ab9df2a>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2401 bytes --]

Hi I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org,

On Fri, 2026-10-02 at 23:08 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> Patch Details
> 
> Series:tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets without full-
> ppgtt (rev2)
> 
> URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/174930/
> 
> State:failure
> Details:https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15931/index.html
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_19262_full -> IGTPW_15931_fullSummaryFAILURE
> Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_15931_full absolutely need to
> be
> verified manually.
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in IGTPW_15931_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-
> infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
> CI.
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-
> tip/IGTPW_15931/index.html
> Participating hosts (10 -> 10)No changes in participating hosts
> Possible new issuesHere are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> IGTPW_15931_full:
> IGT changesPossible regressions * 
>    igt@i915_selftest@live:shard-tglu: PASS [4] -> DMESG-FAIL [3]shard-mtlp:
>    PASS [6] -> DMESG-FAIL [5]
>  * 
>    igt@kms_async_flips@async-flip-suspend-resume@pipe-d-edp-1:
>     - shard-mtlp:         PASS [2] -> ABORT [1] +1 other test abort

My series tested under this pre-merge run introduces changes to two tests:
gem_softpin and gem_close_races.  None of them has been reported as
failing, and the above failures are not related.  Please update CBL filters
and re-report.

Thanks,
Janusz

> Known issues
...

[1] ABORT
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15931/shard-mtlp-2/igt@kms_async_flips@async-flip-suspend-resume@pipe-d-edp-1.html
[2] PASS
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19262/shard-mtlp-2/igt@kms_async_flips@async-flip-suspend-resume@pipe-d-edp-1.html
[3] DMESG-FAIL
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15931/shard-tglu-10/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
[4] PASS
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19262/shard-tglu-9/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
[5] DMESG-FAIL
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15931/shard-mtlp-2/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
[6] PASS
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19262/shard-mtlp-5/igt@i915_selftest@live.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3620 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 15:24 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets without full-ppgtt Janusz Krzysztofik
2026-09-24 15:24 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/intel/gem_softpin: Skip safe-alignment " Janusz Krzysztofik
2026-09-25  7:54   ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-09-25  9:30   ` Krzysztof Karas
2026-09-24 15:24 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/gem_close_race: Skip offset probing " Janusz Krzysztofik
2026-09-25  8:40   ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-09-25  9:47     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2026-10-06 14:27       ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-09-25 10:41   ` Krzysztof Karas
2026-09-24 18:10 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets " Patchwork
2026-09-24 19:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-25  8:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-25 21:21 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-10-01 17:22 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets without full-ppgtt (rev2) Patchwork
2026-10-01 21:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-02  1:49 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-10-02 23:08 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-10-05  8:13   ` Janusz Krzysztofik [this message]
2026-10-05 11:32     ` Ravali, JupallyX
2026-10-05 11:27 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b686f1e04539972035a956484ba2d1c64c826ffd.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox