From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Naladala Ramanaidu <ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <kunal1.joshi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v6 4/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Find display mode fitting in BW for rotations
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 18:19:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6997395-2434-4f7c-acde-d3c7e36a5544@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240718111146.665240-5-ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>
On 7/18/2024 4:41 PM, Naladala Ramanaidu wrote:
> Anticipating bandwidth issues, we expect many tests to fail. To
> address these failures, we will switch to the next lower display
> mode. Some higher display modes will be identified as insufficient
> for downscaling operations on plane scaling. As a solution, we
> will implement a fix: When bandwidth is inadequate for current
> modes, the system will automatically attempt the next lower
> display mode.
>
> Example for failure:
> [drm:intel_compute_min_cdclk [xe]] required cdclk (1066500 kHz)
> exceeds max (652800 kHz)
>
> v2: Fix some styling issues in the patch (Ankit)
> v3: Split single plane and multi plane scaling
> functions arguments in separate patch (Ankit)
> v4: Split single plane and multi plane scaling
> functions in separate patch (Ankit)
> v5: Update check_scaling_pipe_plane_rot to handle
> scaling mode failure by trying next lower mode
> v6: Update commit subject/message and add driver return value
> in igt_debug and igt_skip print (kamil)
>
> Signed-off-by: Naladala Ramanaidu <ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_plane_scaling.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> index 2c4490fd3..6cd7ed35d 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> @@ -582,55 +582,64 @@ static void check_scaling_pipe_plane_rot(data_t *d, igt_plane_t *plane,
> int w, h;
> int width, height;
>
> - mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
> - if (is_clip_clamp == true) {
> - width = mode->hdisplay + 100;
> - height = mode->vdisplay + 100;
> - } else {
> - width = get_width(mode, sf_plane);
> - height = get_height(mode, sf_plane);
> - }
> + for_each_connector_mode(output) {
> + mode = &output->config.connector->modes[j__];
> + igt_debug("Trying mode %dx%d\n",
> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay);
> + if (is_clip_clamp == true) {
> + width = mode->hdisplay + 100;
> + height = mode->vdisplay + 100;
> + } else {
> + width = get_width(mode, sf_plane);
> + height = get_height(mode, sf_plane);
> + }
>
> - if (is_upscale) {
> - w = width;
> - h = height;
> - } else {
> - w = mode->hdisplay;
> - h = mode->vdisplay;
> + if (is_upscale) {
> + w = width;
> + h = height;
> + } else {
> + w = mode->hdisplay;
> + h = mode->vdisplay;
> + }
> + /*
> + * guarantee even value width/height to avoid fractional
> + * uv component in chroma subsampling for yuv 4:2:0 formats
> + */
> + w = ALIGN(w, 2);
> + h = ALIGN(h, 2);
> +
> + igt_create_fb(display->drm_fd, w, h, pixel_format,
> + modifier, &d->fb[0]);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &d->fb[0]);
> + igt_fb_set_position(&d->fb[0], plane, 0, 0);
> + igt_fb_set_size(&d->fb[0], plane, w, h);
> + igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> + commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> + igt_skip_on_f(commit_ret == -ERANGE || commit_ret == -EINVAL,
> + "Mode fail with %dx%d\n", w, h);
> +
> + if (is_upscale)
> + igt_plane_set_size(plane, mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay);
> + else
> + igt_plane_set_size(plane, width, height);
> +
> + if (rot != IGT_ROTATION_0)
> + igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, rot);
> + commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> + if (commit_ret == -ERANGE || commit_ret == -EINVAL)
> + igt_debug("Unsupported scaling factor with fb size %dx%d "
> + "with return value %s\n",
Please dont break the message string as mentioned in last patch.
With that fixed, this is:
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> + w, h, (commit_ret == -EINVAL) ? "-EINVAL" : "-ERANGE");
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> + igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> + cleanup_fbs(d);
> + if (commit_ret == 0)
> + break;
> }
> -
> - /*
> - * guarantee even value width/height to avoid fractional
> - * uv component in chroma subsampling for yuv 4:2:0 formats
> - * */
> - w = ALIGN(w, 2);
> - h = ALIGN(h, 2);
> -
> - igt_create_fb(display->drm_fd, w, h, pixel_format, modifier, &d->fb[0]);
> -
> - igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &d->fb[0]);
> - igt_fb_set_position(&d->fb[0], plane, 0, 0);
> - igt_fb_set_size(&d->fb[0], plane, w, h);
> - igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> - commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> - igt_skip_on_f(commit_ret == -ERANGE || commit_ret == -EINVAL,
> - "Mode fail with %dx%d\n", w, h);
> - if (is_upscale)
> - igt_plane_set_size(plane, mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay);
> - else
> - igt_plane_set_size(plane, width, height);
> -
> - if (rot != IGT_ROTATION_0)
> - igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, rot);
> - commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> -
> - igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> - igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> - cleanup_fbs(d);
> -
> igt_skip_on_f(commit_ret == -ERANGE || commit_ret == -EINVAL,
> - "Unsupported scaling factor with fb size %dx%d\n",
> - w, h);
> + "Unsupported scaling operation in driver with return value %s\n",
> + (commit_ret == -EINVAL) ? "-EINVAL" : "-ERANGE");
> igt_assert_eq(commit_ret, 0);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-18 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-18 11:11 [PATCH i-g-t v6 0/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Improvise the scaling BW issues Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 1/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Update the single plane scaling function arguments Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 12:18 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 2/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Update the multi " Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 12:20 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 3/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Find display mode fitting in BW Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 11:40 ` Kamil Konieczny
2024-07-18 12:45 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 4/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Find display mode fitting in BW for rotations Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 11:44 ` Kamil Konieczny
2024-07-18 12:49 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 5/5] HAX patch do not merge Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 14:18 ` ✗ CI.xeBAT: failure for tests/kms_plane_scaling: Improvise the scaling BW issues. (rev6) Patchwork
2024-07-18 19:13 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-18 11:08 [PATCH i-g-t v6 0/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Improvise the Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 11:08 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 4/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Find display mode fitting in BW for rotations Naladala Ramanaidu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6997395-2434-4f7c-acde-d3c7e36a5544@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kunal1.joshi@intel.com \
--cc=ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox