From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCC06EA88 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:21:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Gupta, Anshuman" Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:21:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210203100310.19441-1-anshuman.gupta@intel.com> <20210203100310.19441-4-anshuman.gupta@intel.com> <161236905581.21832.9494400750427364629@build.alporthouse.com> In-Reply-To: <161236905581.21832.9494400750427364629@build.alporthouse.com> Content-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 3/4] i915/i915_pm_rpm: Add PC10 display off test List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" To: Chris Wilson , "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Box, David E" , "Brown, Len" Cc: "Vivi, Rodrigo" List-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 9:48 PM > To: Gupta, Anshuman ; igt- > dev@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo > Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 3/4] i915/i915_pm_rpm: Add PC10 display > off test > > Quoting Anshuman Gupta (2021-02-03 10:03:09) > > Add a test to validate PC10 residencies while all output's display is > > off. > > The pc10 tests look nice and straightforward. Just a general question on > whether 30s timeout is too lax or just right? Hi Len / David , This is a IGT test to validate PC8/PC10. https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/84737/ We want an optimum test time out value to wait for PC10. Could you please provide your inputs for optimum time out value for PC8/PC10 tests. Thanks, Anshuman. > -Chris _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev