From: "Hellstrom, Thomas" <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
To: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Sharma, Nishit" <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_svm_usrptr_madvise: Unify batch buffer alignment
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 18:54:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc802debb759f521815c448ef67bfafdf941d9cb.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311170354.475828-3-nishit.sharma@intel.com>
On Wed, 2026-03-11 at 17:03 +0000, nishit.sharma@intel.com wrote:
> From: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
>
> This patch refactors the SVM userptr copy test and batch buffer setup
> to use aligned buffer mapping for batch buffers, ensuring
> compatibility
> across both Ponte Vecchio (PVC) and BMG platforms.
> Batch buffer mapping now uses platform-required alignment,
> eliminating
> the need for platform-specific address assignment and conditional
> code
> paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_svm_usrptr_madvise.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_svm_usrptr_madvise.c
> b/tests/intel/xe_svm_usrptr_madvise.c
> index bfa5864e4..db7b9ee35 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_svm_usrptr_madvise.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_svm_usrptr_madvise.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ gpu_batch_init(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t
> src_addr,
> {
> uint32_t width = copy_size / 256;
> uint32_t height = 1;
> - uint32_t batch_bo_size = BATCH_SIZE(fd);
> + uint64_t alignment = xe_get_default_alignment(fd);
> + uint32_t batch_bo_size = ALIGN(BATCH_SIZE(fd), alignment);
> uint32_t batch_bo;
> uint64_t batch_addr;
> void *batch;
> @@ -108,7 +109,7 @@ gpu_batch_init(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t
> src_addr,
> int i = 0;
>
> batch_bo = xe_bo_create(fd, vm, batch_bo_size,
> vram_if_possible(fd, 0), 0);
> - batch = xe_bo_map(fd, batch_bo, batch_bo_size);
> + batch = xe_bo_map_aligned(fd, batch_bo, batch_bo_size,
> alignment);
> cmd = (uint32_t *)batch;
> cmd[i++] = MEM_COPY_CMD | (1 << 19);
> cmd[i++] = width - 1;
> @@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ gpu_copy_batch_create(int fd, uint32_t vm,
> uint32_t exec_queue,
> uint64_t src_addr, uint64_t dst_addr,
> uint32_t *batch_bo, uint64_t *batch_addr)
> {
> - gpu_batch_init(fd, vm, src_addr, dst_addr, SZ_4K, batch_bo,
> batch_addr);
> + gpu_batch_init(fd, vm, src_addr, dst_addr, SZ_16K, batch_bo,
> batch_addr);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -209,10 +210,10 @@ static void test_svm_userptr_copy(int fd)
> &batch_bo, &batch_addr);
> gpu_exec_sync(fd, vm, exec_queue, &batch_addr);
>
> - igt_assert(memcmp(svm_ptr, userptr_ptr, SZ_4K) == 0);
> + igt_assert(memcmp(svm_ptr, userptr_ptr, 64) == 0);
>
> bo_map = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, size);
> - igt_assert(memcmp(bo_map, svm_ptr, SZ_4K) == 0);
> + igt_assert(memcmp(bo_map, svm_ptr, 64) == 0);
>
> xe_vm_bind_lr_sync(fd, vm, 0, 0, batch_addr, BATCH_SIZE(fd),
> DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_MIRROR);
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 17:03 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Unify Batch Buffer Alignment and Introduce Aligned Buffer Mapping nishit.sharma
2026-03-11 17:03 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe: Introduce aligned buffer mapping nishit.sharma
2026-03-11 18:53 ` Hellstrom, Thomas
2026-03-11 17:03 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_svm_usrptr_madvise: Unify batch buffer alignment nishit.sharma
2026-03-11 18:54 ` Hellstrom, Thomas [this message]
2026-03-12 1:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Unify Batch Buffer Alignment and Introduce Aligned Buffer Mapping Patchwork
2026-03-12 1:48 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-12 21:03 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-12 21:45 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc802debb759f521815c448ef67bfafdf941d9cb.camel@intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox