public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naladala, Ramanaidu" <Ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>
To: "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com>,
	<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v1 0/2] Skip intel unsupported downscale tests
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:02:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c25692c3-6896-462c-b4d1-36f0df20ee94@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bca96e1-994a-4984-9088-eaf3f7569638@intel.com>

++ Karthik

Hi Swati,

On 3/20/2026 1:11 PM, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
> Hi Ramanaidu,
>
> On 11-03-2026 01:10 pm, Naladala Ramanaidu wrote:
>> Some scaling tests are expected to be skipped, but they still iterate 
>> over
>> all display modes, which generates excessive logging and eventually hits
>> CI disk‑usage limits. To address this, early skip logic is added 
>> before the
>> dynamic tests begin, preventing unnecessary mode iterations and 
>> reducing CI
>> load.
> Why can't we handle this in blocklists? 

The tests are already blocklisted, but they continue to run. To address 
this limitation, I sent a patch.

  According to Karthik, platform blocklisted tests are only excluded in 
Grafana queries, not during execution. CI intends to generate 
per‑platform testlists from the blocklists, but it doesn’t seem to be 
active yet.

>>
>> Naladala Ramanaidu (2):
>>    tests/kms_plane_scaling: Skip unsupported scaling scenarios
>>    HAX patch do not merge
>>
>>   tests/intel-ci/i915.fast-feedback.testlist | 216 +++-----------
>>   tests/intel-ci/xe.fast-feedback.testlist   | 323 +++------------------
>>   tests/kms_plane_scaling.c                  |  38 +++
>>   3 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 449 deletions(-)
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-20  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11  7:40 [PATCH i-g-t v1 0/2] Skip intel unsupported downscale tests Naladala Ramanaidu
2026-03-11  7:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t v1 1/2] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Skip unsupported scaling scenarios Naladala Ramanaidu
2026-03-11 10:00   ` B, Jeevan
2026-03-11 10:15     ` Naladala, Ramanaidu
2026-03-17  7:38   ` [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Naladala Ramanaidu
2026-03-18  4:29     ` Samala, Pranay
2026-03-18  4:42       ` B, Jeevan
2026-03-11  7:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t v1 2/2] HAX patch do not merge Naladala Ramanaidu
2026-03-11 21:50 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for Skip intel unsupported downscale tests Patchwork
2026-03-11 21:57 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-12 15:34 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-03-17 19:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure for Skip intel unsupported downscale tests (rev2) Patchwork
2026-03-17 19:44 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-19  4:40 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-03-20  7:41 ` [PATCH i-g-t v1 0/2] Skip intel unsupported downscale tests Sharma, Swati2
2026-03-20  8:32   ` Naladala, Ramanaidu [this message]
2026-03-20  9:40     ` Sharma, Swati2

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c25692c3-6896-462c-b4d1-36f0df20ee94@intel.com \
    --to=ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=karthik.b.s@intel.com \
    --cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox