From: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: Soham Purkait <soham.purkait@intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
<badal.nilawar@intel.com>, <kamil.konieczny@intel.com>,
<ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Cc: <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v8 3/5] tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop: Refactor xe_populate_engines to close card_fd and use direct ioctl calls
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:02:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3da90cd-9a83-4018-94a3-01bb185708fd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219094804.835429-4-soham.purkait@intel.com>
On 2/19/2026 1:48 AM, Soham Purkait wrote:
> During GPUTOP engine initialization, the opened card fd is required to
> query engines and obtain configurations for PMU busyness calculation, but
> leaving it open causes the process to appear as a DRM client, which
> conflicts with KMS test requirements. To avoid this, card_fd is closed
> immediately after engine discovery, and engine queries are refactored to
> remove the lib/xe/* dependency in favor of direct ioctl calls, simplifying
> the implementation and reducing igt test library dependencies.
>
> v1:
> - Initialize pmu_device_obj to null.
> v2:
> - Remove dependency on lib/xe/* libraries. (Kamil)
> v3:
> - Refactor ioctl failure check. (Vinay)
> - Check q.size only once. (Vinay)
> - Add num_bytes for asprintf return value. (Vinay)
>
> Fixes: c8106465683f ("tools/gputop/xe_gputop: Add gputop support for xe specific devices")
> Signed-off-by: Soham Purkait <soham.purkait@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.h | 3 +-
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.c b/tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.c
> index bb2caa6ea..d8892c587 100644
> --- a/tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.c
> +++ b/tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> /*
> - * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + * Copyright © 2025-2026 Intel Corporation
> */
>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +
> #include "xe_gputop.h"
>
> #define engine_ptr(pmu_device, n) (&(pmu_device)->engine + (n))
> @@ -92,6 +94,7 @@ void xe_gputop_init(void *ptr, int index,
>
> obj = ((struct xe_gputop *)ptr) + index;
> obj->card = card;
> + obj->pmu_device_obj = NULL;
> }
>
> static int pmu_format_shift(int xe, const char *name)
> @@ -121,20 +124,50 @@ static int engine_cmp(const void *__a, const void *__b)
> return a->drm_xe_engine.engine_instance - b->drm_xe_engine.engine_instance;
> }
>
> +static int engine_query(int fd, struct drm_xe_query_engines **engine_q)
> +{
> + struct drm_xe_device_query q;
> + int ret = 0, num_eng;
> +
> + memset(&q, 0, sizeof(q));
> + q.query = DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES;
> +
> + ret = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &q);
> + if (ret != 0 || q.size == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + num_eng = (int)((q.size - sizeof(struct drm_xe_query_engines)) /
> + sizeof(struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance));
> +
> + *engine_q = (struct drm_xe_query_engines *)calloc(1, q.size);
> + if (!*engine_q)
> + return -1;
> +
> + q.data = (uintptr_t)(*engine_q);
> +
> + ret = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &q);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + free(*engine_q);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return num_eng;
> +}
> +
> void *xe_populate_engines(const void *obj, int index)
> {
> struct xe_gputop *ptr = ((struct xe_gputop *)obj) + index;
> struct igt_device_card *card = ptr->card;
> uint64_t engine_active_config, engine_total_config;
> uint64_t engine_class, engine_instance, gt_shift;
> - struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> + struct drm_xe_query_engines *engine_q;
> struct xe_pmu_device *engines;
> char device[30];
> - int ret = 0;
> - int card_fd;
> + int ret = 0, num_eng;
> + int card_fd = -1;
>
> if (!card || !strlen(card->card) || !strlen(card->render))
Need to check if card->card is null first before strlen? This is not
part of this patch, so can fix in a separate patch.
> - return NULL;
> + goto err;
>
> if (strlen(card->card)) {
> card_fd = igt_open_card(card);
> @@ -142,39 +175,52 @@ void *xe_populate_engines(const void *obj, int index)
> card_fd = igt_open_render(card);
> } else {
> fprintf(stderr, "Failed to detect device!\n");
> - return NULL;
> + goto err;
> }
> - xe_device_get(card_fd);
> +
> + num_eng = engine_query(card_fd, &engine_q);
> + if (num_eng <= 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Engine query failed!\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> engines = malloc(sizeof(struct xe_pmu_device) +
> - xe_number_engines(card_fd) * sizeof(struct xe_engine));
> + num_eng * sizeof(struct xe_engine));
> if (!engines)
> - return NULL;
> + goto err;
>
> memset(engines, 0, sizeof(struct xe_pmu_device) +
again, can use calloc in place of malloc/memset?
Other than that,
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> - xe_number_engines(card_fd) * sizeof(struct xe_engine));
> + num_eng * sizeof(struct xe_engine));
>
> engines->num_engines = 0;
> gt_shift = pmu_format_shift(card_fd, "gt");
> engine_class = pmu_format_shift(card_fd, "engine_class");
> engine_instance = pmu_format_shift(card_fd, "engine_instance");
> xe_perf_device(card_fd, device, sizeof(device));
> + close(card_fd);
> + card_fd = -1;
> +
> engines->device = strdup(device);
> ret = perf_event_config(device, "engine-active-ticks", &engine_active_config);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return NULL;
> + goto err;
>
> ret = perf_event_config(device, "engine-total-ticks", &engine_total_config);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return NULL;
> + goto err;
>
> - xe_for_each_engine(card_fd, hwe) {
> + while (engines->num_engines < engine_q->num_engines) {
> + int num_bytes = 0;
> uint64_t param_config;
> struct xe_engine *engine;
> + struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance hwe;
> +
> + hwe = engine_q->engines[engines->num_engines].instance;
>
> engine = engine_ptr(engines, engines->num_engines);
> - param_config = (uint64_t)hwe->gt_id << gt_shift | hwe->engine_class << engine_class
> - | hwe->engine_instance << engine_instance;
> - engine->drm_xe_engine = *hwe;
> + param_config = (uint64_t)hwe.gt_id << gt_shift | hwe.engine_class << engine_class
> + | hwe.engine_instance << engine_instance;
> + engine->drm_xe_engine = hwe;
> engine->engine_active_ticks.config = engine_active_config | param_config;
> engine->engine_total_ticks.config = engine_total_config | param_config;
>
> @@ -184,12 +230,12 @@ void *xe_populate_engines(const void *obj, int index)
> break;
> }
>
> - ret = asprintf(&engine->display_name, "GT:%u %s/%u",
> - hwe->gt_id,
> - class_display_name(engine->drm_xe_engine.engine_class),
> - engine->drm_xe_engine.engine_instance);
> + num_bytes = asprintf(&engine->display_name, "GT:%u %s/%u",
> + hwe.gt_id,
> + class_display_name(engine->drm_xe_engine.engine_class),
> + engine->drm_xe_engine.engine_instance);
>
> - if (ret <= 0) {
> + if (num_bytes <= 0) {
> ret = errno;
> break;
> }
> @@ -197,9 +243,11 @@ void *xe_populate_engines(const void *obj, int index)
> engines->num_engines++;
> }
>
> - if (!ret) {
> + free(engine_q);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> errno = ret;
> - return NULL;
> + goto err;
> }
>
> qsort(engine_ptr(engines, 0), engines->num_engines,
> @@ -208,6 +256,15 @@ void *xe_populate_engines(const void *obj, int index)
> ptr->pmu_device_obj = engines;
>
> return engines;
> +
> +err:
> + if (card_fd >= 0)
> + close(card_fd);
> + if (engines)
> + free(engines);
> + if (engine_q)
> + free(engine_q);
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> static uint64_t pmu_read_multi(int fd, unsigned int num, uint64_t *val)
> @@ -263,11 +320,11 @@ int xe_pmu_init(const void *obj, int index)
> fd = _open_pmu(type, &engines->num_counters, &engine->engine_active_ticks,
> &engines->fd);
> if (fd < 0)
> - return -1;
> + return fd;
> fd = _open_pmu(type, &engines->num_counters, &engine->engine_total_ticks,
> &engines->fd);
> if (fd < 0)
> - return -1;
> + return fd;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -359,4 +416,3 @@ int xe_print_engines(const void *obj, int index, int lines, int w, int h)
>
> return lines;
> }
> -
> diff --git a/tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.h b/tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.h
> index 1e3856071..dcd82de7d 100644
> --- a/tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.h
> +++ b/tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop.h
> @@ -7,11 +7,10 @@
> #define __XE_GPUTOP_H__
>
> #include <dirent.h>
> +#include <xe_drm.h>
>
> -#include "igt_device_scan.h"
> #include "igt_perf.h"
> #include "utils.h"
> -#include "xe/xe_query.h"
>
> struct xe_pmu_pair {
> uint64_t cur;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 9:47 [PATCH i-g-t v8 0/5] Close any open drm device after engine initialization in GPUTOP Soham Purkait
2026-02-19 9:48 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 1/5] tools: Rename tools/gputop to tools/gputop.src Soham Purkait
2026-02-19 9:48 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 2/5] tools/gputop.src/utils: Add clamp macro to remove dependency on lib/xe/* Soham Purkait
2026-02-19 9:48 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 3/5] tools/gputop.src/xe_gputop: Refactor xe_populate_engines to close card_fd and use direct ioctl calls Soham Purkait
2026-03-11 17:38 ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-03-12 17:02 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay [this message]
2026-02-19 9:48 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 4/5] tools/gputop.src/gputop: Enable support for multiple GPUs and instances Soham Purkait
2026-03-11 17:27 ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-03-26 6:58 ` Purkait, Soham
2026-02-19 9:48 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 5/5] tools/gputop.src/gputop: Add command line option for device filter Soham Purkait
2026-02-19 15:27 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Close any open drm device after engine initialization in GPUTOP (rev9) Patchwork
2026-02-19 15:47 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-19 18:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-02-19 19:45 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3da90cd-9a83-4018-94a3-01bb185708fd@intel.com \
--to=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox